M/S.Rmd Realtors Private Limited v. Mr.M.G.Rajamanikkom

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/24TH MAGHA, 1936 Con.Case(C).No. 1419 of 2014 (S) IN WP(C).18623/2013 ------------------------------------------------------ IN WP(C) 18623/2013 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN W.P.(C):

------------------------------------ M/S.RMD REALTORS PRIVATE LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR MR.LUCKACHAN K.P., AGED 52 YEARS, S/O.PAILY, 40/7669, MARKET ROAD KOCHI - 682 011.

BY ADVS.SRI.P.A.MOHAMMED SHAH SRI.SOORAJ T.ELENJICKAL SRI.T.S.SARATH SMT.P.M.MAZNA MANSOOR RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS 2 & 4 IN THE W.P.(C): -----------------------------------------------

1. MR.M.G.RAJAMANICKAM, AGE NOT KNOWN, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, ERNAKULAM.

2. MR.JOSEPH, AGE NOT KNOWN, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN, TAHSILDAR, KANAYANNUR TALUK, TALUK OFFICE, ERNAKULAM.

BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. JOSEPH GEORGE. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

rvs.

Con.Case(C).No. 1419 of 2014 (S) IN WP(C).18623/2013 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES :

----------------------- ANNNEXURE-I: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 23/08/2013 IN WP(C) NO.18623/2013 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.

ANNNEXURE-II: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.L-10-23146/14 ISSUED UNDER THE RTI ACT FROM THE DISTRICT COLLECTORATE, ERNAKULAM. RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES :

------------------------ NIL.

/TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE RVS.

P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.

----------------------------------- Contempt Case (Civil) No. 1419 of 2014 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of February, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The learned Government Pleader submits that the direction given by this Court as per Annexure 1 judgment, has been complied with. However, a short delay has been resulted, which is sought to be condoned expressing sincere regrets in this regard.

2.

After hearing both the sides, this Court finds that no further steps are necessary. The Contempt of Court Case stands closed. It is made clear that, this will be without prejudice to the rights and liberties of the petitioner to challenge the order which is stated as passed on 03.02.2014.

Sd/- P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE.

Pn