Lalha.S v. Ani

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/29TH KARTHIKA, 1937 Crl.L.P..No. 453 of 2015 ---------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN ST 85/2011 of J.M.F.C.-IV, KOLLAM DATED 07-08-2013 PETITIONER/COMPLAINANT :- -------------------------------------------- LALHA.S, AGED 42 YEARS, D/O. RAJAPPAN CHETTIAR, KALIYIL PADINJATTATHIL, THEKKEVILA P.O., KOLLAM - 691016.

BY ADV. SRI.THYPARAMBIL THOMAS THOMAS RESPONDENTS/ACCUSED & STATE :- -------------------------------------------------------

1. ANI, VIJAYAVILASOM, MUNDAKKAL WEST, KOLLAM - 685 011.

2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

R BY SMT.LISHA M.G., PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS CRIMINAL LEAVE PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

Crl.L.P..No. 453 of 2015 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES :- --------------------------------------------- ANNEXURE A : CERTIFIED COPY ORDER IN CRL.R.P.NO.36/2013 DATED 2/6/2014 OF IIND ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE, KOLLAM.

RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES :- NIL ------------------------------------------------ //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE

P.UBAID, J.

============================ Crl.L.P.No.453 of 2015 ============================ Dated this the 20th day of November, 2015

ORDER

Heard.

2.

The petitioner is aggrieved by the acquittal of the accused by the trial court, and his grievance is that he could not adduce proper evidence in Court at the right stage. I feel that the petitioner has a case to be argued in appeal. Hence, the petition is allowed. The petitioner is granted leave to file appeal against the judgment of acquittal of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-IV, Kollam in S.T.No.85 of 2011.

Sd/- P.UBAID JUDGE //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE