Muhammed Nazeem v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA MONDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/29TH POUSHA, 1936 Crl.MC.No. 224 of 2015 () -------------------------- CRIME NO. 1001/2014 OF KASARAGOD POLICE STATION,KASARAGOD DISTRICT ---------------- PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED & DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. MUHAMMED NASEEM, S/O.MOHAMMED AKBER, KOTTIKKULAM HOUSE, ALICHERY, KASARAGOD DISTRICT, NOW RESIDING AT KOMBANADKA, CHEMNAD P.O., KASARAGOD DISTRICT.
2. SAMEERA BANU, D/O.YOUSUF, URMIJAL HOUSE, KUBANOOR, P.O.BAKUR, KASARAGOD DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.V.SOHAN SMT.SREEJA SOHAN.K.
SRI.ROVIN RODRIGUES RESPONDENT/STATE:
------------------------------------ STATE OF KERALA, THROUGH SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KASARAGOD POLICE STATION, KASARAGOD DISTRICT, (CRIME NO.1001/2014) REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN-682 031. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V.S.SREEJITH THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: sts
CRMC.NO.224/2015 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEX 1 COPY OF THE COMPLAINT ALONG WITH FIR REGISTERED AS CRIME NO.1001/2014 OF KASARAGOD POLICE UNDER SECTION 498A OF I.P.C., DATED 08/12/2014.
ANNEX 2 COPY OF THE AGREEMENT EXECUTED BETWEEN PETITIONER NO.1 AND 2 IN THE PRESENCE OF WITNESSES AND ATTESTED BY NOTARY PUBLIC AT KASARAGOD, DATED 29/12/2014.
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:
NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE sts
B.KEMAL PASHA, J.
................................................................ CRL. M.C. No.224 of 2015 ............................................................... Dated this the 19th day of January, 2015
O R D E R
Petitioners are the accused and defacto complainant in Crime No.1001/14 of the Kasaragod Police Station registered for the offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.
2.
Petitioners have come up with this Crl.M.C. under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for getting Annexure-I complaint in Crime No.1001/14 of the Kasaragod Police Station, quashed.
3.
Heard. According to the petitioners, all the matters in dispute between the first petitioner and the second petitioner have been amicably settled and presently the defacto complainant/second petitioner has no
CRL.M.C.No.224 of 2015 -: 2 :- complaints against the first petitioner and, therefore, the proceedings against the first petitioner may be quashed. 4.
Petitioners 1 and 2 have filed a joint affidavit affirming that all the matters in dispute between them have been amicably settled and, hence, all further proceedings in the matter referred to above can be quashed.
5.
When all the matrimonial disputes have been settled between the parties and as the defacto complainant has no complaints against the first petitioner, it is only just and expedient in the interest of justice to quash the proceedings referred to above.
In the result, this Crl.M.C. is allowed and Annexure-I complaint in Crime No.1001/14 of the Kasaragod Police Station, and all further proceedings based on it, are hereby quashed.
B.KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE ul/-