Surendran Nair v. The State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/17TH MAGHA, 1936 Crl.MC.No. 600 of 2015 ------------------------------- CC 68/2014 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, ADOOR ......

PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED:

-------------------------------------- SURENDRAN NAIR, NAVANEETHAM HOUSE, KAITHAKKAL MURI, PALLIKKAL VILLAGE. BY ADVS.SRI.T.P.PRADEEP SRI.P.K.SATHEES KUMAR RESPONDENT(S)/STATE AND DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

2. RAMANIYAMMA, MADATHIL VEETTIL, KAITHAKKAL MURI, PALLICKAL VILLAGE, ADOOR - 691 523.

R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.JIBU P. THOMAS R2 BY ADV. SRI.UNNI. K.K.

THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: msv/

Crl.MC.No. 600 of 2015 -------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES:

ANNEXURE A : TRUE COPY OF THE CHARGE SHEET IN CC NO.68/2014. ANNEXURE B: TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES:

NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/

B.KEMAL PASHA, J.

================ Crl.M.C. No. 600 of 2015 ======================= Dated this the 6th day of February, 2015

O R D E R

The accused in C.C.No.68/2014 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court, Adoor, which has arisen from Crime No.2312/2013 of the Adoor Police Station for the offence punishable under Section 324 Indian Penal Code, has come up under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash all proceedings in C.C.No.68/2014.

2. The prosecution case is that on 15.12.2013 at 7 p.m., the petitioner beat the de facto complainant, who is the second respondent herein with a wheel spanner, thereby causing hurt. According to the petitioner, the matter has been amicably settled between him and the second respondent herein.

3. The second respondent has filed an affidavit affirming that the matter has been amicably settled between her and the petitioner and that she has no complaints against the petitioner. She has entered

Crl.M.C. No. 600 of 2015 appearance through her counsel. The learned counsel for the second respondent also endorses the fact that the affidavit has been sworn in by the de facto complainant on her own volition.

4. When the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, it is just and proper in the interest of justice to quash all proceedings in C.C.No.68/2014 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court, Adoor. In the result,this Crl.M.C is allowed and all further proceedings in C.C.No.68/2014 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court, Adoor, are hereby quashed. Sd/- B.KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE stu //True copy// P.A to Judge