Vinod v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/6TH KARTHIKA, 1937 Crl.MC.No. 658 of 2015 ------------------------------------- C.C.NO.101/2011 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-I, NEYYATINKARA ---------------- PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED NO.2 & 3 :

------------------------------------------------------------

1. VINOD, AGED 35 YEARS, S/O.THANKAPPAN, JISHNU BHAVAN, MELE PUTHEN VEEDU, KARUMAM, THIRUVALLAM VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.

2. RAJEEV KUMAR, AGED 36 YEARS, S/O.SASIDHARAN, RATHEESH NIVAS, PANATHARA, PACHALLOOR, THIRUVALLAM VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.S.RAJEEV SRI.K.K.DHEERENDRAKRISHNAN SRI.V.VINAY RESPONDENT(S)/STATE/COMPLAINANT :

----------------------------------------------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031. [CRIME NO.65/2009 OF NEMOM POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT].

2. CHANDRA SEKHARAN, C/O.ALKA VENTURES PRIVATE LTD., OPP. TAGORE THEATRE, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 010.

R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.SAREENA GEORGE THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

Msd.

Crl.MC.No. 658 of 2015 ----------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES :

ANNEXURE I:

TRUE COPY OF THE FIRST INFORMATION REPORT ALONG WITH THE FIRST INFORMATION STATEMENT IN CRIME NO.65/2009 OF NEMOM POLICE STATION.

ANNEXURE II:

CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO.65/2009 OF NEMOM POLICE STATION.

RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES :

NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE.

Msd.

B.KEMAL PASHA, J.

================ Crl.M.C. No. 658 of 2015 ======================= Dated this the 28th day of October, 2015

O R D E R

It seems that the offences were allegedly committed in Saudi Arabia by the accused persons, who are Indian citizens. In such case, as per Section 188 Cr.P.C., no such offence shall be inquired into or tried in India except with the previous sanction of the Central Government. It seems that no such sanction has been obtained so far. Without such a sanction, the court below shall not proceed with the inquiry or trial of the case.

With the said direction, this Crl.M.C is disposed of. Sd/- B.KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE stu