Thasleema v. Stateof Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW MONDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/18TH JYAISHTA, 1937 Crl.MC.No. 741 of 2015 () -------------------------- CC.NO.1232/2014 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT- III, PUNALUR KOLLAM DISTRICT ----------------- PETITIONER/5TH ACCUSED :

------------------------------------------- TASLEEMA, AGED 19 YEARS W/O. AL SAMEER, CHARUVILA VADAKKETHIL KARYARA KIZHAKKE MURI, VILAKKUDI VILLAGE KOLLAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.VINOY VARGHESE KALLUMMOOTTIL RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANTS/STATE/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682031.

2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE PUNALUR POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691001.

3. SALEENA BEEGAM, AGED 30 YEARS D/O. SHAKEELA BEEVI, PUTHUVILA PADINJATTETHIL VEEDU KUNDAYAM MURI, PATHANAPURAM VILLAGE PATHANAPURAM TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691001.

R1 & R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. R. REMA THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/-

Crl.MC.No. 741 of 2015 () ----------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES :

------------------------------------------- ANNEXURE A1:

TRUE COPY OF THE CHARGE SHEET IN C.C.NO.1232/2014 PENDING BEFORE THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-III, PUNALUR.

ANNEXURE A2:

TRUE COPY OF THE MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE OF THE PETITIONER DATED 4.10.2013.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL ---------------------------------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Mn

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.

--------------------------- Crl.M.C. No.741 of 2015 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of June 2015

O R D E R

Petition filed under Sec.482 Cr.P.C.

2. Petitioner is the 5th accused in C.C. No.1232 of 2014 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-III, Punalur. He along with the co-accused is charged with having committed the offence under Sec.498A of Indian Penal Code. The prayer is to quash the proceedings in the criminal case on the ground that no offence has been made out against the petitioner.

3. Heard.

4. If the materials produced by the prosecution in support of the final report do not disclose commission of any offence by the petitioner, her remedy is to plea for discharge in the Trial Court. The proceedings cannot be quashed under Sec.482 Cr.P.C.

In the result, this Crl.M.C. is dismissed. The petitioner may plea for discharge in the Trial Court. Sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE NS