Samuel Barrac v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/8TH KARTHIKA, 1937 Crl.MC.No. 757 of 2015 () -------------------------- CRIME NO. 2239/2014 OF THIRUVALLA POLICE STATION, PATHANAMTITTA DISTRICT ====================== PETITIONERS/ACCUSED:
------------------------------------
1. SAMUEL BARRAC, KODIYATTUKALAYIL HOUSE KUNNAMTHANAM, THIRUVALLA.
2. JIBI,VALUPARAMPIL HOUSE, MANJADI, THIRUVALLA.
3. RENJI JOHN,NADUVILEPARAMPIL HOUSE, MANJADI, THIRUVALLA.
4. SUNIL, MELOTHIL HOUSE, MANJADI, THIRUVALLA.
5. KOCHUMON, AMMANATHU HOUSE, MEENTHALAKARA, THIRUVALLA.
6. BLESSON, PARUTHIKKATTIL HOUSE, MEENTHALAKARA, THIRUVALLA.
7. BIPIN, PARUTHIKKATTIL HOUSE, MEENTHALAKARA, THIRUVALLA.
8. ACHANKUNJU, ELANTHOOR HOUSE, MANJADI, THIRUVALLA.
9. PR.P.V.ISSAC, MEPRAL HOUSE, KUNNAMTHANAM, THIRUVALLA.
10. SUDHI, KALLUNKALL HOUSE, KUNNATHANAM, THIRUVALLA.
11. DEENAMMA, PARUTHIKKATTIL HOUSE, MEENTHALAKARA, THIRUVALLA.
12. MARYKUTTY ANIL, MELOTHIL HOUSE, MANJADI, THIRUVALLA.
13. MARIYAMMA, MELOTHIL HOUSE, MANJADI, THIRUVALLA.
14. ROSAMMA, VALUPARAMBIL HOUSE, MANJADI, THIRUVALLA.
15. RACHEL, KODIYATTUKALAYIL HOUSE, KUNNAMTHANAM, THIRUVALLA.
16. PRASAD, NADUVILEPARAMPIL HOUSE, MANJADI, THIRUVALLA. BY ADVS.SRI.S.SREEKUMAR (SR.) SMT.INDU SUSAN JACOB
Crl.MC.No. 757 of 2015 () -2RESPONDENTS/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:
--------------------------------------------------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA.
2. SHEEBA KURIAN W/O.K.P.KURIAN, PARSONAGE, IPC EBENEZER CHURCH AMALLOOR, UTHUMKUZHI, VADAKKETHIL HOUSE KOTOOR, KAVIYOOR VILLAGE.
R2 BY ADV. SRI.V.PHILIP MATHEW R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. JUSTIN JACOB THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
P. UBAID, J.
--------------------------------------- Crl.M.C.No.757 of 2015 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of October, 2015
O R D E R
This application is to quash the FIR and further proceedings. Now, it is submitted that the police has completed investigation, and submitted final report in court. In such a situation, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this Crl.M.C. with liberty to file proper application as regards the final report itself.
The submission is accepted, and accordingly, this Crl.M.C. is dismissed as withdrawn, without prejudice to the right of the petitioners to bring proper proceedings as regards the final report.
Sd/- P. UBAID, JUDGE sd // True Copy // P.A. to Judge