← Library
High Court of KeralaCrl.MC/799/2015allowed

Abdul Latheef C.V. v. Bhushara K.K.

2015-08-05Honourable Mr. Justice P.Ubaid4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/14TH SRAVANA, 1937 Crl.MC.No. 799 of 2015 ----------------------- IN C.M.P 6595/2014 of J.M.F.C., MATTANNUR CRIME NO. 1027/2014 OF MATTANNUR POLICE STATION, KANNUR PETITIONER/ACCUSED:

------------------ ABDUL LATHEEF C.V, AGED 40 YEARS, S/O.UMMER, C.V HOUSE, UTHIYOOR P.O, MATTANNUR, KALLUR AMSOM, UTHIYOOR DESOM, PIN - 670 702.

BY ADVS.SRI.C.KHALID SRI.N.A.JOSEPH SRI.K.P.MOHAMED SHAFI SMT.K.S.HASEENA SRI.PHIJO PRADEESH PHILIP SRI.K.REEHA KHADER SMT.K.K.NESNA RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT AND STATE:

--------------------------------

1. BHUSHARA K.K, AGED 32 YEARS, D/O.KHALID, KARUPPAN VEEDU (K.K HOUSE), CHAKKAD, VILAKKODE - 670 001.

(WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF IRITTY POLICE STATION)

2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, COCHIN - 682 031.

R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.K.SUBHASH R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.V.H.JASMINE THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

Crl.MC.No. 799 of 2015 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:

ANNEXURE 1: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT C.M.P NO.6595/2014 FILED BEFORE THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE, MATTANNUR DTD.15.10.2014. ANNEXURE 2: COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.1027/2014 DATED 20.10.2014 REGISTERED BY MATTANNUR POLICE STATION. ANNEXURE 3: COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT DATED 24.1.2015. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:

NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE ab

P.UBAID, J.

--------------------------------------- Crl.M.C No.799 of 2015 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 5th day of August, 2015

O R D E R

The petitioner seeks orders quashing the F.I.R and further proceedings in Crime No.1027/2014 of the Mattanur Police Station, registered under Sections 420 and 498A r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code on the complaint of one Bhushara. Orders are sought on the ground of amicable settlement of the whole dispute between the accused and the de facto complainant out of court. The de facto complainant Bhushara is the 1st respondent in this proceeding brought under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. She has filed affidavit to the effect that she has settled the whole dispute with the accused and she has no grievance or complaint. 2.

In so many decisions, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that even in cases involving non-compoundable offences, the High Court can quash the prosecution; be it at the crime stage or at the trial stage or even at the appellate or revisional stage; if the parties have really settled the whole dispute, or if continuance of the prosecution will not serve any

Crl.M.C No.799 of 2015 purpose. Here, I find a real case of settlement between the parties, and I also find that continuance of prosecution in such a situation will not serve any purpose other than wasting the precious time of the court, when the case ultimately comes before the court.

In the result, this petition is allowed. The F.I.R and further proceedings in Crime No.1027/2014 of the Mattanur Police Station will stand quashed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Sd/- P.UBAID JUDGE ab