High Court of KeralaCrl.MC/886/2015dismissed as withdrawn

Amrutha Jose v. State Of Kerala

2015-09-09Honourable Mr. Justice P.Ubaid3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/18TH BHADRA, 1937 Crl.MC.No. 886 of 2015 () -------------------------- CC 2221/2014 of JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, PALA CRIME NO. 1427/2014 OF PALA POLICE STATION, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT =============== PETITIONER/ACCUSED:

--------------------------------- AMRUTHA JOSE, AGED 29 YEARS D/O.JOSEPH, VAYAMBALIL HOUSE, VAKKAD P.O ERUMAPRA KARA, MOONNILAVU VILLAGE MEENACHIL TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SMT.TISSY ROSE K CHERIYAN RESPONDENTS/STATE & DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM 682 031.

2. ANCY JOSEPH, AGED 50 YEARS, W/O.JOSEPH K.MATHEW KAPPALUMAKKALHOUSE, CHENNADU P.O POONJAR 686 581, THEKKEKARA VILLAGE MEENACHIL TALUK-686581, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.

R2 BY ADV. SRI.SHAJI THOMAS R2 BY ADV. SRI.BINU PAUL R2 BY ADV. SRI.T.V.VINU R2 BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE PULIKUTHIYIL R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. JUSTIN JACOB THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

Crl.MC.No. 886 of 2015 () APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS ----------------------------------- ANNEXURE A1. COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.1427/14. ANNEXURE A2. COPY OF THE COMPLAINT AS CMP 9211/14. ANNEXURE A3. COPY OF THE CHARGE SHEET IN CRIME NO.1427/14. ANNEXURE A4. COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS -------------------------------------- NIL TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE SD

P. UBAID, J.

--------------------------------------- Crl.M.C.No.886 of 2015 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of September, 2015

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Crl.M.C. with liberty to file an application before the trial court for discharge. I also find that such a course will be the appropriate course in the circumstances of the case. The submission made by the learned counsel is accepted, and the Crl.M.C. is dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to make application for discharge before the learned Magistrate.

Sd/- P. UBAID, JUDGE sd