R.M.Ramachandran v. E.K.Santhakumari

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA THURSDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/28TH PHALGUNA, 1936 Crl.MC.No. 890 of 2015 -------------------------------- CRIME NO. 92/2015 OF MATTANNUR POLICE STATION , KANNUR ---------------- PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED:

------------------------------------- R.M.RAMACHANDRAN, AGED 57 YEARS S/O.KANNAN NAIR, RAYAROTH HOUSE, KAYALOOR POST CHAVASSERY, MATTANNUR MUNICIPALITY KANNUR DISTRICT - 670 702.

BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE SEBASTIAN RESPONDENT(S)/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT & STATE:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. E.K.SANTHAKUMARI, AGED 52 YEARS W/O.PADMANABHAN, KANDATHIL HOUSE, KOLARI AMSOM KAYALOOR, KANNUR DISTRICT-670001.

2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.JIBU P.THOMAS THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PJ

Crl.MC.No. 890 of 2015 -------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES ----------------------------------------- ANNEXURE A: A TRUE COPY OF THE FIR AND F1 STATEMENT IN CRIME 92/2015 OF MATTANNUR POLICE STATION, KANNUR DISTRICT.

ANNEXURE B: A TRUE COPY OF THE DISABILITY CERTIFICATE DATED 25/11/2006 ISSUED FROM THE DISTRICT HOSPITAL, KANNUR.

ANNEXURE C: A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 15/12/2011 IN WPC 33480/2011 ANNEXURE D: A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 30/11/2013 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY OF THE MATTANNUR MUNICIPALITY ANNEXURE E: A TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 30/11/2013 ISSUED FROM MATTANNUR MUNICIPALITY RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES ------------------------------------------- NIL.

/ TRUE COPY / P.S. TO JUDGE PJ

B.KEMAL PASHA, J.

................................................................ CRL. M.C. No.890 of 2015 ............................................................... Dated this the 19th day of March, 2015

O R D E R

On hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner for quite some time, this Court is of the view that the present Crl.M.C. can be quashed, with liberty to the petitioner to move again at appropriate stage, if aggrieved, on the filing of the final report, if any, in the matter.

Accordingly, this Crl.M.C. is disposed of with the above said observation.

Sd/- B.KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE ul/- [True copy] P.S. to Judge