Jaseer v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/15TH PHALGUNA, 1936 Crl.MC.No. 1025 of 2015 () --------------------------- IN CC 264/2008 of J.M.F.C.-I,ATTINGAL CRIME NO. 1/2008 OF CHIRAYINKEEZHU POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PETITIONER(S)/A4:
-------------------------------- JASEER AGED 30 YEARS /O. JABBAR, JASEER MANZIL, NEAR MANCHADIMOODU SARKARA VILLAGE, CHIRAYINKIL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.SHAJIN S.HAMEED RESPONDENT(S)/STATE:
---------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA REPRESENED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE CHIRAYINKEEZHU POLICE STATION REPRESENTED THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERANAKULAM.
R BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. P. MAYA THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.MC.No. 1025 of 2015 () --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- A - FREE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO. 01/2008 OF CHIRAYINKEEZHU POLICE STATION.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS: NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE sab
P.UBAID, J.
------------------------- Crl. M.C No. 1025 of 2015 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of March, 2015.
O R D E R
The petitioner herein is the accused No.4 in C.C No.264 of 2008 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Attingal. He seeks a direction from this court for speedy and expeditious trial and dispose of the case on the ground that he has good prospects for a job abroad, and that if the trial is delayed he will lose of such employment. As required by the court the learned Magistrate submitted a report on 26.2.2015. This reports shows that the total pendency of cases there as on 31.1.2015 is 8513. The report also shows that the trial process in C.C No.264 of 2008 has just commenced. Two witnesses could not be produced by the prosecution, and so warrant is now pending against them. There is summons to the other witnesses also. Once the trial process has commenced, it would be inappropriate for the court to direct the court below to make a time bound disposal. However, earnest efforts will have to be made to dispose of the case as expeditiously as possible, in view of the grievance projected by the petitioner.
Crl. M.C No. 1025 of 2015 No doubt, the case will get priority, because it is a case of 2008.
In the result, this Crl.M.C is closed with direction to the court below that earnest efforts shall be made to try and dispose of the C.C No.264 of 2008 within the shortest possible time, considering the genuine grievance of the petitioner that the delay in the trial process will cause lose of employment. P.UBAID, JUDGE sab