Manjusha.T.R v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/6TH PHALGUNA, 1936 Crl.MC.No. 1160 of 2015 () --------------------------- CC 2212/2013 of JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-I, CHAVAKKAD ============== PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.3 & 5:

--------------------------------------------------

1. MANJUSHA.T.R., AGED 34 YEARS W/O.RENJITH, MANATHIL HOUSE KANDANASSERY P.O. THRISSUR DISTRICT.

2. MRS.LALLU SUNNY, W/O.JIJU, AGED 38 YEARS KANNANATTIL HOUSE, CHALISSERY P.O PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN.679536 .

BY ADVS.SRI.V.A.PRADEEP KUMAR SMT.JENNY THANKAM RESPONDENT:

--------------------- STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA.

BY Sr.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. SAREENA GEORGE P. THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

SD

P. UBAID, J.

--------------------------------------- Crl.M.C.No.1160 of 2015 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of February, 2015

O R D E R

The petitioners herein are the accused in three complaints brought under Section 420 IPC. All these cases are now pending before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Chavakkad. They want to surrender before the learned Magistrate and apply for bail. They somehow got information from some source, which is not known, that the learned Magistrate would insist on production of different sets of sureties in the three cases. It is not known from where the petitioners got such information. Any way, they apprehend that they will be remanded to custody in case they could not produce six sureties. I do not think that the learned Magistrate will insist on production of different sets of sureties in the different cases. What the court would look into is not in fact the number of the sureties, but the solvency of the sureties produced by the accused to the extent of the total amount of the bond ordered in the three cases. This Court does not think that any Magistrate in Kerala will maintain such an

Crl.M.C.No.1160 of 2015 unjust or impractical approach.

With the above observations, this Crl.M.C. is closed. The petitioners can very well surrender before the learned Magistrate and make application for bail.

Sd/- P. UBAID, JUDGE sd