← Library
High Court of KeralaCrl.MC/1316/2015allowed

Hameed v. Jomon Joseph

2015-03-04Honourable Mr. Justice P.Ubaid5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/13TH PHALGUNA, 1936 IN CC 588/2014 of J.M.F.C-I,KASARAGOD CRIME NO. 362/2011 OF BADIADKKA POLICE STATION, KASARGOD PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED:

------------------------------------------

1. ABDUL HAMEED AGED 31 YEARS S/O.ABDUL KHADER, KEDINCHI, BADIADKA VILLAGE AND POST KASARAGOD.

2. IQBAL AGED 34 YEARS S/O.YOUSUF, SUNFLOWER HOUSE, BADIADKA VILLAGE AND POST KASARAGOD.

3. ABDUL MANAF AGED 27 YEARS S/O.ABOOBAKER, C.A.MANZIL, BADIADKA VILLAGE AND POST KASARAGOD.

4. ABDUL RAUF AGED 33 YEARS S/O.MOIDEENKUNHI, CHENNARKATTA BADIADKA VILLAGE AND POST, KASARGOD

5. MUHAMMED ASLAM AGED 35 YEARS S/O.KUNHAHAMMAD, BEEJAMTHADKA BADIADKA VILLAGE AND POST, KASARAGOD.

6. SHEREEF B AGED 31 YEARS S/O.MUHAMMED, ALFINA MANZIL, BADIADKA VILLAGE AND POST KASARAGOD.

7. SHEFEEK A.M AGED 27 YEARS S/O.MOIDU, A.K.MANZIL, BADIADKA VILLAGE AND POST KASARAGOD.

8. HANEEFA K AGED 41 YEARS S/O.HASSAINAR, KANYANA HOUSE, BADIADKA VILLAGE AND POST KASARAGOD

9. MUHAMMED HANEEFA AGED 47 YEARS S/O.MOIDEEN, KARVAR MANZIL, BADIADKA VILLAGE AND POST KASARAGOD.

BY ADV. SRI.S.JIJI

RESPONDENT(S)/DE-FACTO COMPLAINANT AND STATE: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. JOMON JOSEPH, AGED 36 YEARS S/O.JOSEPH, KUTTIKKATTUKUNNEL, CHEMPARATHIMAR BADIADKA, KASARAGOD.

2. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

R1 BY ADV. SMT.K.S.SANTHI R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. SAREENA GEORGE. P THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- ANNEXURE-A1:

CERTIFIED COPY OF FINAL REPORT IN CR.362/2011 OF BADIADKA POLICE STATION.

ANNEXURE-A2:

AFFIDAVIT DATED 16.2.2015 SWORN BY THE IST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS: NIL ---------------------------------------

P.UBAID, J.

------------------------- Crl. M.C No. 1316 of 2015 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of March, 2015.

O R D E R

The petitioners herein are the accused in C.C No.588 of 2014 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Kasaragod. They seek orders quashing the prosecution on the ground of amicable settlement of the whole dispute between them and the de facto complainant. Crime in this case was registered under Sections 143, 147, 148, 323, 324 and 506(ii) r/w 149 of IPC on the complaint of one Jomon Joseph who is the first respondent in this proceeding brought under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. He has filed affidavit to the effect that he has settled the whole dispute with the accused, and he has no grievance or complaint now. In so many decisions, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that even in cases involving noncompoundable offences, the High Court can quash the prosecution in pending proceedings, if the parties have really settled the whole dispute amicably out of court, and continuance of the proceedings will not serve any purpose in

Crl. M.C No. 1316 of 2015 such a circumstance of amicable settlement. Here, I find a real and genuine case of settlement between the parties. This is not a case involving any public interest or public issue. The parties have come to terms amicably on the intervention of persons acceptable to both sides, and I am satisfied that the parties are now on quite cordial terms. In such a situation, continuance of the prosecution will not serve any purpose, other than wasting the precious time of the court. No doubt, nobody will support the prosecution in such a situation, if the case goes to trial.

In the result, this petition is allowed. The prosecution against the petitioners herein in C.C No.588 of 2014 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Kasaragod will stand quashed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Accordingly, the petitioners will stand released from prosecution, and the bail bond, if any, executed by them will stand discharged.

P.UBAID, JUDGE sab