V.K.Saji v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID MONDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/15TH POUSHA, 1936 Crl.MC.No. 347 of 2014 ---------------------- CRIME NO. 691/2013 OF KARINKUNNAM POLICE STATION, IDUKKI PETITIONER/APPELLANT:

--------------------- V.K.SAJI, AGED 42 YEARS, ADVOCATE, S/O.LATE KRISHNAN, VELLARAMKUNNEL, KARIMKUNNAM P.O, VIA THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI DISTRICT.

BY ADV. DR.GEORGE ABRAHAM RESPONDENTS:

-----------

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031.

2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KARIMKUNNAM POLICE STATION, KARIMKUNNAM P.O.

VIA THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI DISTRICT-685 581.

3. THE SECRETARY KARIMKUNNAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KARIMKUNNAM P.O.

VIA THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI DISTRICT-685 581.

R3 BY ADV. SRI.THOMAS J.ANAKKALLUNKAL R1 & R2 BY SR. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.SAREENA GEORGE.P THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

Crl.MC.No. 347 of 2014 ----------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:

----------------------- ANNEXURE-A. COPY OF THE LOCATION SKTECH OF THE PETITIONER'S PROPERTY ANNEXURE-B. COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY K.R.RAGHAVAN. ANNEXURE-C. COPY OF THE COMPLAINT MADE BY SEBASTIAN JOHN DATED 13/009/2012.

ANNEXURE-D. COPY OF THE REPORT OF THE VILLAGE OFFICER ANNEXURE-E.COPY OF THE ORDER OF TAHSILDAR, THODUPUZHA DATED 3/8/2012.

ANNEXURE-F.COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO.24094/2012. ANNEXURE-G.PHOTOGRAPH SHOWING THE PROPERTY OF THE PETITIONER ANNEXURE-H.COPY OF THE REPROT OF THE TALUK SURVEYOR. ANNEXURE-I.COPY OF THE F.I.S FILED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT ANNEXURE-J.COPY OF THE F.I.R. NO.691/13 FILED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES:

----------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE ab

P.UBAID, J.

--------------------------------------- Crl.M.C No.347 of 2014 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 5th day of January, 2015

O R D E R

The prayer in this proceeding is to quash FIR. The learned Public Prosecutor submits that the crime itself stands now referred. It appears that the petitioner accepts the same. Hence the submission made by the learned Public Prosecutor is recorded, and the Criminal Miscellaneous Case is closed.

P.UBAID JUDGE ab