Vipin v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW FRIDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/6TH CHAITHRA, 1937 Crl.MC.No. 1570 of 2015 () --------------------------- CC.NO. 1443/2012 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-II, ALUVA CRIME NO. 1546/2011 OF KALAMASSERY POLICE STATION,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT -------------------- PETITIONER/ACCUSED:

---------------------------------------- VIPIN, AGED 36 YEARS, S/O. LATE SIVADAS, RESIDING AT NO.4, 21ST A STREET, N BLOCK, ANNA NAGAR EAST, CHENNAI-600 102 BY ADVS.SRI.BIMAL K.NATH SRI.SREEVALSAN.V SMT.DIVYA C BALAN SMT.M.K.SHIMI SRI.D.SREENATH RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANT/DE-FACTTO COMPLAINANT: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM- 31

2. RESMI, AGED 24 YEARS, D/O BABU, KRISHNAKRIPA HOUSE, MYTHRI NAGAR, KARIPPAYI ROAD, SUNDDARAGIRI, KALAMASSERY, ERNAKULAM -683 104 R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.JIBU P. THOMAS R2 BY ADV. SMT.C.A.LINCY THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: sts

Crl.MC.No. 1570 of 2015 () --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES:

-------------------------------------------- ANNEX A1:

A TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CC NO.1443 OF 2012 OF JFCM -II ALUVA ANNEX A2:

THE AFFIDAVIT OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES:

NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE sts

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Crl.M.C.No.1570 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 27th day of March, 2015

O R D E R

Petitioner and the second respondent are husband and wife respectively. He is the accused in C.C.No.1443/2012 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Aluva.

2.

It is alleged that he committed the offence under Section 498A IPC.

3.

It is submitted that the matter has been settled. The prayer is to quash the proceedings in the criminal case. 4.

Heard.

5.

The second respondent has filed an affidavit to the effect that the dispute has been settled and she has no objection to the proceedings in the criminal case being quashed. I am satisfied that no public interest is involved in this case.

In the result, Crl.M.C. is allowed. The proceedings in

Crl.M.C.No.1570 of 2015 -2C.C.No.1443/2012 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Aluva are quashed.

Sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE //True copy// P.A. TO JUDGE shg/