Lal Kumar v. Sub Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/29TH PHALGUNA, 1936 Crl.MC.No. 1840 of 2015 () --------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

--------------------------

1. LAL KUMAR AGED 36 YEARS S/O. SOMAN, SIVAM, CHARUMMOODU AYIROOPPARA P.O., KULIYAZHTHURA VILLAGE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 584.

2. SHAIBI W/O. LAL KUMAR, SIVAM, CHARUMMOODU AYIROOPPARA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 584.

3. SHIBU S/O. RAGHUNATHAN, SHAIBI NIVAS, CHARUMMOODU AYIROOPPARA P.O., KULIYAZHTHURA VILLAGE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 584.

4. SHERIIF S/O. RAGHUNATHAN, SHAIBI NIVAS, CHARUMMOODU AYIROOPPARA P.O., KULIYAZHTHURA VILLAGE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 584.

BY ADV. SRI.M.ZIYAD RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE POTHENCODE POLICE STATION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 584.

2. K. VIJAYAN S/O. KUNJAN, ARYA BHAVAN, CHARUMMOODU AYIROOPPARA P.O., KULIYAZHTHURA VILLAGE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 584

3. BINDU W/O. VIJAYAN, ARYA BHAVAN, CHARUMMOODU AYIROOPPARA P.O., KULIYAZHTHURA VILLAGE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 584 R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. SAREENA GEORGE. P THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-032015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

Crl.MC.No. 1840 of 2015 () --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- ANNEXURE A1: TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT ANNEXURE A2: TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER BEFORE THE C.I OF POLICE, KAZHAKUTTAM ANNEXURE A3: THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 29.05.2014 PASSED BY THE DIVISION BENCH OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WP(C) NO.12418/2014 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS: NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE sab

P.UBAID, J.

------------------------- Crl. M.C No.1840 of 2015 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of March, 2015.

O R D E R

The petitioners herein seek some prayers on some anticipated cause of action. Presently there is no crime or complaint against them. They apprehend that the respondents may bring some complaint. Accordingly, they seek a direction under Section 482 Cr.P.C to the police that they shall not be summoned to the police station without ascertaining the genuineness and truth of the allegations in the complaint. The prayer is really strange. Presently, there is no proceeding against them under the Code of Criminal Procedure. It is not certain why they seek such a relief, when there is no case against them presently. The relief as sought by the petitioners cannot be granted under Section 482 Cr.P.C. This Crl.M.C does not deserve consideration. Accordingly, this Crl.M.C is dismissed in limine without being admitted to files. P.UBAID, JUDGE sab