Pradeep Kumar.V.L. v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA TUESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/3RD AGRAHAYANA, 1937 Crl.MC.No. 2420 of 2015 () --------------------------- CRIME NO. 254/2015 OF KASARAGOD POLICE STATION, KASARAGOD PETITIONER/ACCUSED:

--------------------- PRADEEP KUMAR.V.L. AGED 40 YEARS S/O VASUDEVAN PILLAI, RESIDING AT 'RADHAS', CHAVARA KARUNAGAPPILLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.I.V.PRAMOD SRI.S.U.NAZAR RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT/STATE:

------------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682031.

2. REHMATH W/O ABBAZ, KASAFELIS, NEAR VILLAGE OFFICE, VELOOR, P.O.

VELOOR, PAYYANNUR VIA KANNUR DISTRICT-670370.

R2 BY ADVS. SRI.JAWAHAR JOSE SRI.ARUN AJAY SHANKAR R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.SAREENA GEORGE.

THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

Crl.MC.No. 2420 of 2015 () --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES :

-------------------------- ANNEXURE A1: A TRUE COPY OF THE BANK STATEMENT OF SYNDICATE BANK, KASARAGOD BRANCH DATED 6.4.2015.

ANNEXURE A2: A TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.4691/2014 DATED 16.9.2014 OF SRO, KASARAGOD.

ANNEXURE A3: A TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DATED 17.9.2014. ANNEXURE A4: A TRUE COPY OF STATEMENT OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 30.3.2015.

ANNEXURE A5: A TRUE COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER DATED 30.3.2015 ISSUED BY THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF, KASARAGOD.

ANNEXURE A6: A TRUE COPY OF THE FIR NO.254/2015 DATED 30.3.2015 OF KASARAGOD POLICE STATION.

RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES :

NIL -------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE.

STU

B. KEMAL PASHA, J.

................................................................ CRL.M.C. No. 2420 of 2015 ............................................................... Dated this the 24th day of November, 2015

O R D E R

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the 2nd respondent.

2. On hearing either side, it seems that the matter involved, even if the transactions are admitted, can only be a breach of contract. There are no ingredients to invite a criminal offence in the matter. Matters being so, leaving opportunity to the 2nd respondent to pursue other appropriate remedies, this Crl.M.C is allowed. In the result, all further proceedings as against the petitioner in Annexure-A6 First Information Report in Crime No.254/15 of the Kasaragod Police Station, are hereby quashed.

Sd/- B. KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE.

stu