Manzoor v. State

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE 2015/13TH JYAISHTA, 1937 Crl.MC.No. 2489 of 2015 --------------------------------- CRIME NO. 579/2015 OF CHATHANNOOR POLICE STATION, KOLLAM PENDING ON JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, PARAVUR, KOLLAM .......

PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED:

-------------------------------------- MANZOOR, AGED 19 YEARS, S/O.SHEREEF, ATTUKAL PUTHENVEEDU, PALAKULANGARA, KALLUMATHAZHAM P.O., KILIKOLLUR, KOLLAM.

BY ADV. SRI.B.MOHANLAL RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANT & STATE:

-------------------------------------------------------------

1. STATE, REPRESENTED BY THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHATHANNOOR POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT, THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KEALA, ERNAKULAM.

2. MR.SAJEENA A., D/O.SHAHUBANATH, PALAVILAVEEDU, MUTTAKKAVU, NEDUMPANA P.O., KOLLAM, PIN - 691 505.

R2 BY ADV. SRI.K.P.ANIL KUMAR (SASTHAMCOTTA) R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.DHANESH MATHEW MANJOORAN THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: msv/

Crl.MC.No. 2489 of 2015 ---------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES:

ANNEXURE A1- THE TRUE COPY OF THE FIR AND FIS IN CRIME NO.579/2015 OF CHATANNOOR POLICE STATION REGISTERED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

ANNEXURE A2- THE TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 13.4.2015.

RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES:

NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.

--------------------------- Crl.M.C. No.2489 of 2015 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of June 2015

O R D E R

Petition filed under Sec.482 Cr.P.C.

2. Petitioners are accused in Crime No.579 of 2015 of the Chathannoor Police station. He is alleged to have committed the offences under Secs.294(b), 341, 323 and 354 (B) of Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that the matter has been settled and the proceedings in the criminal case may be quashed.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, 2nd respondent and the learned Public Prosecutor.

4. The petitioner and the 2nd respondent were classmates. The dispute has been settled. The 2nd respondent has filed an affidavit to that effect. He has no objection to the proceedings in the criminal case being quashed. I am satisfied that the allegations are true and no public interest is involved in this case.

In the result, this Crl.M.C. is allowed. The proceedings in Crime No.5179 of 2015 of the Police station are quashed.

Sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE / True Copy / NS P.A. To Judge