Rajkumar v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL 2015/8TH VAISAKHA, 1937 Crl.MC.No. 2598 of 2015 --------------------------- PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
------------------- RAJKUMAR, AGED 28 YEARS, S/O.RAMACHANDRAN, CHANKOOR VEEDU, PALLARIMANGALAM MURI, THEKKEKARA VILLAGE (P.O), MAVELIKARA.
BY ADVS.SMT.ASHA ELIZABETH MATHEW SRI.NIRMAL.V.NAIR RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT & INVESTIGATING OFFICER: --------------------------------------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM- 682 031.
2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, POLICE STATION, KANAKAKUNNU (P.O) BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.ABIJITT LESSLI THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28-04-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.MC.No. 2598 of 2015 --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :- ----------------------- ANNEXURE A1 A TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION OF MMV EXCAVATOR BEARING REGISTRATION NO.KL-23-E-4083. ANNNEXURE A2 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT PREFERRED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 22 OF THE MINES & MINERALS (DEVELOPMENT & REGULATION) ACT.
ANNEXURE A3 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 13/05/2014 OF THIS COURT IN CRL MC 2529/2014.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS :- NIL.
---------------------- True copy P.A to Judge
ANIL K.NARENDRAN, J.
---------------------------------- Crl.M.C.No.2598 of 2015 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 28th day of April, 2015
ORDER
The petitioner is the registered owner of a JCB MMV Excavator bearing registration No.KL-23-E-4083, which was seized alleging transportation of gravel, which is an offence punishable under Rule 48K read with Rule 58(1) of the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules. The vehicle was seized by the second respondent on 22.4.2015. According to the petitioner, though the alleged offence is a compoundable offence under Section 23A of the Mines & Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act and Rule 32 Kerala Minerals (Prevention of Illegal Mining, Storage and Transportation) Rules, 2015, the second respondent did not consider such request made for compounding the offence. Therefore the petitioner seeks interference of this Court.
2.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Public Prosecutor.
3.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Crl.M.C. is disposed of directing the petitioner to make an
Crl.M.C.No.2598 of 2015 application to compound the offence within a period of one week from today. If such an application is received by the second respondent, the said respondent shall consider and pass appropriate orders thereon as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of such application. The Criminal M.C. is disposed of as above.
ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE skj