Munnu Antony v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID TUESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF MAY 2015/15TH VAISAKHA, 1937 Crl.MC.No. 2613 of 2015 --------------------------- CC 687/2014 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, MUVATUPUZHA. CRIME NO. 388/2014 OF VAZHAKULAM POLICE STATION. ..........
PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED:
---------------------------------------
1. MUNNU ANTONY, AGED 34, S/O.MARY DASAN, PULLAKUDIYIL HOUSE, ACM-COLLECTIONS, KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LTD., PALARIVATTOM.
2. PRAJEESHKUMAR R.P, AGED 31, S/O.PEETHAMBARAN, USHA BHAVAN, MANAGER-COLLECTIONS, KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LTD., PALARIVATTOM.
3. JIMASHADU P.A., AGED 24, S/O.ALIYAR, PADINJARECHALIL HOUSE, MUDAVOOR P.O.
BY ADVS.SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN SRI.SAIJO HASSAN RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANTS:
---------------------------------------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VAZHAKULAM POLICE STATION, VAZHAKULAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
3. MARY ANTONY, W/O.ANTONY, AGED 55, PULAPARAMBIL HOUSE, AVOLIKKARA, MUVATTUPUZHA VILLAGE.
R1 & R2 BY SENIOR PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.P.K.ABDUL RAHMAN R3 BY ADV. SRI.R.T.PRADEEP THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
mbr/
Crl.MC.No. 2613 of 2015 --------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES:
------------------------------------------- ANNEXURE-I: TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.388/2014 OF VAZHAKULAM POLICE STATION.
ANNEXURE-II: TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN C.C.NO.687/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, MUVATTUPUZHA.
ANNEXURE-III: TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN PETITIONERS AND THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES:
- NIL --------------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.S. TO JUDGE mbr/
P.UBAID, J.
------------------------- Crl. M.C No.2613 of 2015 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 5th day of May, 2015.
O R D E R
The petitioners seek orders quashing the prosecution in C.C No. 687 of 2014 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Muvattupuzha, involving the offence under Sections 448 and 506(1) IPC. The offences are well compoundable under Section 320 Cr.P.C. It is not known why the petitioners approached this vacation court when the regular court will have sitting on all days in a week. The petitioners and the victim can very well approach the learned Magistrate for composition under Section 320 Cr.P.C.
With these observations this Crl.M.C is closed. Sd/- P.UBAID, JUDGE sab