Haridas @ Narayanankutty v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW FRIDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF MAY 2015/1ST JYAISHTA, 1937 Crl.MC.No. 2630 of 2015 () --------------------------- CRMC.NO.919/2015 OF ADDL.SESSIONS COURT, THRISSUR CRIME NO. 1342/2014 OF PAZHAYANNUR POLICE STATION , THRISSUR DISTRICT --------------------- PETITIONER/ACCUSED:

------------------------------------- HARIDAS @ NARAYANANKUTTY, PROPRIETOR, M/S. HARIDAS SWEET PALACE, S/O.OORAKKATTIL KRISHNANKUTTY GUPTHAN,AGED 39 YEARS, OORAKKATTIL HOUSE, PATTIPARAMBU P.O., THIRUVILVAMALA, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.G.HARIHARAN SRI.PRAVEEN.H.

RESPONDENT(S)/STATE & COMPLAINANT:

--------------------------------------------------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM -682 031

2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PAZHAYANNUR POLICE STATION, PAZHAYANNUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.DHANESH MATHEW MANJOORAN THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: sts

Crl.MC.No. 2630 of 2015 () ------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES:

---------------------------------------------- ANNEX I:

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER MADE IN CRL.MC.NO.919/2015 DATED 20.04.2015 BEFORE THE SESSIONS JUDGE, THRISSUR RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES:

NIL ------------------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE sts

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.

............................................

Crl.M.C. No.2630 of 2015 (D) ............................................... Dated this the 22nd day of May, 2015

O R D E R

The petitioner was granted bail by the Sessions Court, Thrissur subject to certain conditions. The accusation was that he sexually abused his 17 year old step-daughter and thus committed the offences under sections 6 and 10 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and Section 23 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) of Children Act, 2000. One of the conditions is that he shall not enter the limits of Pazhayannur Police Station except for complying with the direction in the bail order. The prayer is to delete the condition.

2. Heard.

3. The learned Sessions Judge imposed the condition apparently for the reason that the petitioner's presence in the area will frighten the child and adversely affect the investigation. I do not find any reason to delete the condition. In the result, this petition is dismissed.

Sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE DST //True Copy// P.A. o Judge