Dr.Jaikrishnan v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW FRIDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF MAY 2015/1ST JYAISHTA, 1937 Crl.MC.No. 2699 of 2015 () --------------------------- CRIME NO. 1358/2013 OF SREEKARIYAM POLICE STATION , THIRUVANANTHAPURAM ------------------ PETITIONERS/ACCUSED :
---------------------------------------
1. DR.JAIKRISHNAN S/O.LATE DR.MURALEEDHARAN NAIR AGED 32 YEARS, RESIDING AT ALLIVEEDU, T.C.8/135, CHERUVAIKKAL SREEKARIYAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. DR.SIVAKUMARI, W/O.LATE R.RAMANCHANDRAN NAIR, AGED 58 YEARS, RESIDING AT DO.
3. POOJA AJAY, D/O.AJAYANANDA KUMAR, AGED 22 YEARS, RESIDING AT T.C.4/1470(1) CLIFF VALLEY, NANTHANCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
4. GIRIJA A.KUMAR, W/O.AJAYANANDA KUMAR, AGED 50 YEARS, RESIDING AT DO.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.CHANDRASEKHAR SRI.V.AJAKUMAR SRI.P.A.MOHAMMED SHAH RESPONDENTS/STATE/COMPLAINANT :
----------------------------------------------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM
2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, CRIME DETACHMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CITY OFFICE OF THE CITY POLICE COMMISSIONER THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 013.
3. DR.RESHMA R.KUMAR @ RESHMA, D/O.ANILA, RESIDING AT SREE RESHMAM, PANNIVIZHA MURI MARKET ROAD, ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT PIN: 691 523.
R1 & R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. DHANESH MATHEW MANJOORAN R3 BY ADV. SMT.RAKHI RAVIKUMAR THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/-
Crl.MC.No. 2699 of 2015 () ------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES :
------------------------------------------- ANNEXURE 1:
CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIR ALONG WITH FIS LEADING TO THE REGISTRATION OF THE CRIME.
ANNEXURE 2:
TRUE COPY OF THE COMPROMISE PETITION IN O.P. NO.755/2014.
ANNEXURE 3:
TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 13B. ANNEXURE 4:
TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN IN BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DECLARING HER SAID INTENTIONS AND FURNISHED TO THE 1ST PETITIONER RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL --------------------------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Mn
K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.
............................................
Crl.M.C. No.2699 of 2015 ............................................... Dated this the 22nd day of May, 2015
O R D E R
The first petitioner is the husband of the third respondent. The second petitioner is his mother, the third petitioner his cousin and the fourth petitioner the sister of the second petitioner.
2. The petitioners are accused of having committed the offences under sections 323, 377 and 498A IPC, Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and 66C of the Information Technology Act. It is submitted that this matter along with the other disputes has been settled and the proceedings in the criminal case may be quashed.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the third respondent and the learned Public Prosecutor.
4. The third respondent has filed an affidavit to the effect that all the disputes between the parties concerned have been settled and she has no objection to the proceedings in the criminal case being quashed. I am satisfied that the allegations in the petition are true and no public interest is involved in this case. In the result, the petition is allowed proceedings in Crime No. 1358 of 2013 of Sreekariyam Police Station are quashed. Sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE DST //True Copy// P.A. o Judge