Yakoob v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL 2015/11TH CHAITHRA, 1937 Crl.MC.No. 1236 of 2012 () ---------------------------------- AGAINST THE COMMON JUDGMENT IN S.C.358/2002 & S.C.439/2009 OF ASST. SESSIONS COURT, KOTTARAKKARA, DTD: 18.09.2009. PETITIONER(S):

----------------------- YAKOOB, S/O.SHAIK MYTHEEN, SHEMEENA MANZIL, KAITHODU MURI, NILAMEL VILLAGE, KOLLAM DIST.

BY ADV. SRI.ALEXANDER GEORGE.

RESPONDENT(S):

-------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-31.

2. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KADACKAL POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DIST-691 508.

3. HAZEENA, W/O.NISSAM, SANU MANZILIL, POOVATHUR MURI, KAITHODU, ELIKUNNAMUKAL, NILAMEL VILLAGE, KOLLAM DIST-691 536.

R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. V.H. JASMINE THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01-04-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

:2:

Crl.MC.No. 1236 of 2012 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS :

ANNEX.AI:- A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE CHARGE SHEET IN CRIME NO 109/2000 OF CHADAYAMANGALAM POLICE STATION.

ANNEX.NO II:- A TRUE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE COMMON JUDGEMENT IN S.C.358/2002 AND S.C.439/09 ON THE FILE OF ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE, KOTTARAKARA.

ANNEX.NO.III:- THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE DEPOSITION OF PW1 IN S.C.358/2002 AND 439/2009.

ANNEX.NO.IV :- THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE DEPOSITION OF PW2 IN S.C.358/2002 AND 439/2009.

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS :

NIL //True Copy// P.A. to Judge.

ss

K. RAMAKRISHNAN, J.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Crl. M.C. No.1236 of 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dated this the 1st day of April, 2015

O R D E R

No representation for the petitioner even today. Last hearing date also there was no representation and interim order granted was vacated and it was posted for disposal today. Even today, there is no representation. It appears that, the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. So the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Communicate this order to the court below at the earliest.

Sd/- K. Ramakrishnan, Judge // True Copy // P.A. to Judge ss