Jomon Puthenpurackal v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID TUESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/3RD CHAITHRA, 1937 Crl.MC.No. 2109 of 2013 () --------------------------- CMP 3956/2011 of JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT -III, TRIVANDRUM DATED 22-09-2012 PETITIONER/COMPLAINANT:

---------------------- JOMON PUTHENPURACKAL S/O.KURIAKOSE, PUTHENPURACKAL HOUSE NEENDOOR P.O KOTTAYAM.

BY ADV. SRI.C.R.SIVAKUMAR RESPONDENTS/STATE AND ACCUSED:

------------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 031.

2. S. CHANDRAMOHAN SAROJAM VEEDU, VP-12/1194, POUDIKKONAM AYIRPARA MURI, VEMBAYAM VILLAGE NOW AT TC.14/326 NEAR VALSALA NURSING HOME, NANDAVANAM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

3. MAMMEN VARGHESE PRINTER & PUBLISHER MALAYALA MANORAMA DAILY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

4. JACOB MATEHW PRINTER & PUBLISHER MALAYALA MANORAMA DAILY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

5. MAMMAN MATHEW CHIEF EDITOR MALAYALA MANORAMA DAILY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

6. JOHN MUNDAKKAYAM BUREAU CHIEF MALAYALA MANORAMA DAILY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

R3-R6 BY ADV. SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. P. MAYA THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: smv

P. UBAID. J.

========================= Crl.M.C. No. 2109 of 2013 ============================ Dated this the 24th day of March, 2015

O R D E R

What is under challenge is a discharge order, having the effect of concluding the trial process as against the accused Nos. 3 to 6 in the trial court. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the proceeding, with liberty to file revision petition against the impugned order. In view of the delay from the date of order, the petitioner will have to make appropriate application for condonation of delay before the revisional court. The submission is recorded. Accordingly, this Crl.M.C. is dismissed as withdrawn, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to file appropriate revision against the impugned order, subject to the question of limitation.

Sd/- P. UBAID, JUDGE //true copy// P.A. To Judge Smv