Venugopal v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS MONDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/25TH JYAISHTA, 1937 Crl.MC.No. 3169 of 2015 ----------------------------------- CC 1502/2010 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-I, ERNAKULAM --------------------- PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED:

------------------------------------- VENUGOPAL, AGED 64 YEARS, S/O.RAMAN, ODASSERY HOUSE, CHERAI P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.V.A.PRADEEP KUMAR RESPONDENT(S):

-------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

2. KANNAN RAGHU, S/O.RAGH NANDANAN, IKKAMPARAMBIL VEEDU, THURAVUR P.O. THURAVUR, ANGAMALY, PIN 683586.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.SAREENA GEORGE THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PJ

Crl.MC.No. 3169 of 2015 ---------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES ----------------------------------------- ANNEXURE-A1: TRUE COPY OF FIR IN CRIME NO.1319/2009 IN C.C.NO.1502/2010 ON THE FILE OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-I, ERNAKULAM.

ANNEXURE-A2: TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT FILED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT IN C.C.NO.1502/2010 ON THE FILE OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-I, ERNAKULAM.

ANNEXURE-A3: TRUE COPY OF CHARGE IN CRIME NO.1319/2009 IN C.C.NO.1502/2010 ON THE FILE OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-I, ERNAKULAM.

RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES -------------------------------------------- NIL.

/ TRUE COPY / P.S TO JUDGE PJ

ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.

----------------------------- Crl.M.C.No.3169 Of 2015 --------------------------------- Dated this the 15 th day of June, 2015.

O R D E R

Sri.V.A.Pradeep Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits tat the petitioner would limit his prayer for appropriate direction to ensure consideration of the application for discharge that may be filed by the petitioner before the court below concerned. 2.

In the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice it is ordered that in case the stage for entertaining the plea of discharge has not yet been crossed, it is open to the petitioner to file appropriate application for discharge before the court below, upon which the said court will consider such plea and after hearing both sides will take a decision thereon in accordance with law without much delay.

With the above observations and directions, this Crl.M.C stands finally disposed of.

ALEXANDER THOMAS, Judge.

bkn/-