P.V.Muhammed Kunhi v. K.P.Basheera
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW THURSDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/14TH JYAISHTA, 1937 Crl.MC.No.3317 of 2015 --------------------------------- CC NO.1686/2014 OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-II, KANNUR.
CRIME NO.570/2009 OF VALAPPATANAM POLICE STATION,KANNUR. PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2:
------------------------------------------- PUTHIYA VEETIL MUHAMMED KUNHI,S/O.EBRAHIM, AGED 44 YEARS,P.V.HOUSE,CHOOLAM PEEDIKA, IRINAV AMSOM,MADAKARA DESOM,KANNUR-670631.
BY ADV.SRI.K.RAJESH SUKUMARAN RESPONDENTS/DEFACTO-COMPLAINANT & STATE:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.
KUNHIPURAYIL BASHEERA,D/O.MAHAMOOD, AGED 31 YEARS,JAMEELA MANZIL,AZHEEKAL, KANNUR-670005.
2.
STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM,PIN-682031.
R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.DHANESH MATHEW MANJOORAN. THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
pk
Crl.MC.No.3317 of 2015 ---------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
---------------------------------------- ANNEXURE A1:CERTIFIED COPY OF THE PRIVATE COMPLAINT FILED BEFORE THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT NO.II,KANNUR. ANNEXURE-A2:CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIRST INFORMATION REPORT IN CRIME NO.570/2009 OF VALAPATTANAM POLICE STATION. ANNEXURE-A3:CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT FILED IN CRIME NO.570/2009 BY THE VALAPATTANAM POLICE BEFORE THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT NO.II,KANNUR. ANNEXURE-A4:CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN CC 303/2010 DATED 23.10.2014 ON THE FILE OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT NO.II,KANNUR.
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:
NIL ------------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE pk
K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.
==================== Crl.M.C. No. 3317 of 2015 ==================== Dated this the 4th day of June, 2015
O R D E R
Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
2. The petitioner prays for quashing the proceedings in C.C. No. 1686 of 2014 on the ground that the allegations against him are bald and vague. If that is true, the remedy is to plead for discharge.
In the result, this Crl.M.C. is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to plead for discharge.
Sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE DST //True Copy// P.A. To Judge