V.V.Narayanan v. The Excise Commissioner

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/11TH BHADRA, 1937 Crl.MC.No. 3336 of 2015 ---------------------------------- CRIME NO. 80/2014 OF PAPPINISSERY EXCISE RANGE OFFICE, KANNUR .......

PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED:

-------------------------------------- V.V.NARAYANAN, S/O.LATE KUNHAPPU, VANNATHAN VALAPPIL, CHERUKUNNU, KAVINISSERY, KANNUR DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.M.SASINDRAN SRI.SATHEESHAN ALAKKADAN RESPONDENT(S):

--------------------------

1. THE EXCISE COMMISSIONER, PAPPINISSERY EXCISE RANGE, PAPPINISSERY, KANNUR DISTRICT.

2. THE EXCISE COMMISSIONER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, KANNUR-670 001.

4. THE ASSISTANT EXCISE COMMISSIONER PAPPINISSERY, KANNUR DISTRICT-670 001.

5. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.SAREENA GEORGE THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: msv/

Crl.MC.No. 3336 of 2015 ----------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- ANNEXURE AI : A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION OF CMP.NO.7400/2014 FILED BY THE PETITIONER.

ANNEXURE AII : A DOCKET ORDER OF THE ORDER DATED 6-1-2015 IN CMP.NO.7400 OF 2014.

ANNEXURE AIII : A COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 5-2-2015 ISSUED TO THE COUNSEL OF THE PETITIONER BY THE JFCM COURT-I, KANNUR IN THE ABOVE CASE.

ANNEXURE AIV : A TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER ON 9-2-2015 WHICH IS NUMBERED AS CMP.NO.949/2015 RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES:

NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE.

Msv/

B.KEMAL PASHA, J.

................................................................ CRL. M.C. No. 3336 of 2015 ............................................................... Dated this the 2nd day of September, 2015

O R D E R

The petitioner wanted the second sample to be analysed in a different laboratory other than the Regional Chemical Examiners' Laboratory, Kozhikode. The court below has directed the petitioner to furnish the name and address of the laboratory to which the second sample has to be sent. The said direction passed by the court below is not open to any challenge at all.

The petitioner is directed to furnish the name and address of the laboratory within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the court below. The Crl.M.C. is disposed of with the above direction. Sd/- B. KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE.

ul/- // True Copy // PS to Judge