← Library
High Court of KeralaCrl.MC/2301/2014allowed

Bilbit Mathew v. State Of Kerala

2015-10-30Honourable Mr. Justice P.Ubaid2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN THURSDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF AUGUST 2014/30TH SRAVANA, 1936 Crl.MC.No. 2301 of 2014 ------------------------------------ CRIME NO. 429/2012 OF KUDIYANMALA POLICE STATION , KANNUR DISTRICT ------------ PETITIONER / ACCUSED :

------------------------------------- BILBIT MATHEW, AGED 32 YEARS, S/O.MATHEW, CHUVATTANI PUTHENPURAKKAL HOUSE, POOPARAMBA, CHEMPERI.P.O., ERUVESSI AMSOM, TALIPARAMBA TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.V.A.SATHEESH SRI.V.T.MADHAVANUNNI RESPONDENTS / STATE & DEFACTO COMPLAINANT & VICTIM : --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM THROUGH S.H.O. KUDIYANMALA POLICE STATION, KANNUR DISTRICT.

2. ABRAHAM, AGED 53 YEARS, S/O.MATHEW, KOTTARATHIL HOUSE, VALIYAPARAMBA, CHEMPERI.P.O., ERUVESSI AMSOM, TALIPARAMBA TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT - 670 632.

3. ANJU ABRAHAM, AGED 19 YEARS, D/O.ABRAHAM, KOTTARATHIL HOUSE, VALIYAPARAMBA, CHEMPERI.P.O., ERUVESSI AMSOM, TALIPARAMBA TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT- 670 632.

R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.DHANESH MATHEW MANJOORAN R3 BY ADV. SRI.J.ABHILASH THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21-08-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Msd.

V.K.MOHANAN, J =========================== Crl.M.C No.2301 of 2014 ============================ Dated this the 21st day of August, 2014

ORDER

The above Crl.M.C seen to have filed on 21.04.2014. After the adjournment of the case on 22.04.2014, the case was posted on 03.06.3014 on which date the counsel for the petitioner prayed and posted after a week. Again when the case was taken on 13.06.2014, there was no representation. It is again came up for consideration on 18.08.2014 on which date also the counsel sought adjournment and accordingly, posted to this day. Today, when the case is taken, there is no representation. The above approach of the petitioner shows that he is not interested in prosecution the matter. Accordingly, the above Crl.M.C is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/- V.K.MOHANAN, JUDGE vdv //True Copy// P.A to Judge