R.Gopinathan Pillai v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MARCH 2015/10TH CHAITHRA, 1937 Crl.MC.No. 2941 of 2013 () --------------------------- S.T.NO.574/2012 of JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT - II, ALUVA PETITIONER(S)/1ST AND 2ND ACCUSED:

----------------------------------------------------------

1. R.GOPINATHAN PILLAI, AGED 66 YEARS, RESIDING AT SREE BHAVAN, IVARKALA NORTH, NORTH PUTHANAMBALAM P.O., QUILON DISTRICT, PINCODE - 691553.

2. K.PONNAMMA, AGED 43 YEARS, W/O.R.GOPINATHAN PILLAI, RESIDING AT SREE BHAVAN, IVARKALA NORTH, NORTH PUTHANAMBALAM P.O., QUILON DISTRICT, PINCODE - 691553 BY ADV. SRI.PEEYUS A.KOTTAM RESPONDENT(S)/STATE AND COMPLAINANT:

-----------------------------------------------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN - 682031.

2. ANEESH, AGED 34 YEARS, S/O.RAVINDRANATHAN UNNITHAN, VAZHAYILAAHZIKATH PUTHANVEEDU, VELLIMAN P.O., EDAVALAM MURI, PERINAD VILLAGE, KUNDARA, QUILON DISTRICT, NOW RESIDING AT VARNAM, HOUSE NO.49, VIDYA NAGAR, NEAR COCHIN UNIVERSITY, COCHIN UNIVERSITY P.O., PINCODE - 682022.

R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.V.H.JASMINE.

R2 BY ADV. SRI.DINESH MATHEW J.MURICKEN THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Bb

K. Ramakrishnan, J.

============================== Crl.M.C.No.2941 of 2013 ============================== Dated this, the 31st day of March, 2015.

O R D E R

When the application came up for hearing today, the Counsel for the second respondent, who is the complainant in the lower court submitted that, the matter has been settled between the parties and the case has already been withdrawn. The Counsel for the petitioners also submitted that, to his knowledge also the matter has been settled and in view of the submission made by the Counsel for the second respondent, the learned Counsel submitted that the above submissions may be recorded and the Criminal Miscellaneous Case may be dismissed as not pressed.

So, the submissions made by the Counsel for the petitioners and the second respondent were recorded and the Criminal Miscellaneous Case is dismissed as not pressed. Interim orders granted is vacated and Crl.M.A.No.5724/2013 is dismissed.

Office is directed to communicate this order to the concerned court immediately.

Sd/- K.Ramakrishnan, Judge.

Bb [True copy] P.A to Judge