Jishnu v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW FRIDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JULY 2015/19TH ASHADHA, 1937 Crl.MC.No. 4270 of 2015 ---------------------------------- CRIME NO. 2252/2014 OF VADANAPPALLY POLICE STATION , TRISSUR ------------------- PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED:
-------------------------------------- JISHNU, AGED 21 YEARS, S/O.RANJITH, KAREPARAMBIL HOUSE, NATTIKA DESOM, NATTIKA VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.A.HAROON RASHEED RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANT:
---------------------------------------------- 1.
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VADANAPALLY POLICE STATION, TRISSUR DISTRICT, THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
2.
SMT.HASEENA, AGED 36 YEARS, ABDUL AZEEZ, ARAKKAVEETIL HOUSE, RESIDING AT KARAPPAM VEETTIL HOUSE, EDAMUTTAM P.O, VALAPPAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680001. R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V.S.SREEJITH R2 BY ADV. SRI.C.R.REKHESH SHARMA THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PJ
Crl.MC.No. 4270 of 2015 ---------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES ---------------------------------------- ANNEXURE A1: COPY OF THE FIRST INFORMATION REPORT AND FIRST INOFORMATIONA STATEMENT IN CRIME NO.2252/14 OF VADANAPPALLY POLICE STATION IN THRISSUR DISTRICT. ANNEXURE A2: COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT EXECUTED BY THE R2 RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURE ---------------------------------------- NIL.
/ TRUE COPY / P.S TO JUDGE PJ
K.ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.
------------------------------------------- Crl.M.C.No.4270 of 2015 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of July, 2015
ORDER
Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
2. The petitioner is the sole accused in Crime No.2252 of 2014 of Vadanapally Police Station registered for the offences under Sections 323, 354, 341, 452 and 506(1) IPC. It is submitted that the matter has been settled and the proceedings in the criminal case may be quashed.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and for the second respondent and the learned Public Prosecutor.
4. The second respondent has filed an affidavit to the effect that the matter has been settled and she has no objection to the proceedings in the criminal case being quashed. I am satisfied that the allegation is true and no public interest is involved in this case. This is a fit case to invoke the jurisdiction of this court under Section 482 Cr.P.C to quash the proceedings in the criminal case. In the result, this Crl.M.C is allowed. The proceedings in Crime No.2252 of 2014 of Vadanapally Police Station are quashed. Sd/- K.ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE cms /True copy/ P.S.to Judge