Sajitha v. The Sub Collector

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/11TH BHADRA, 1937 Crl.MC.No. 4436 of 2015 ----------------------------------- PROCEEDINGS NO. J-2180/2014 DATED 27-06-2015 OF SUB COLLECTOR, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM .........

PETITIONER(S)/ACUSED:

------------------------------------ MRS.SAJITHA, AGED 43 YEARS, W/O MELETHIL USMAN, POOLAMANNA P.O., TUVOOR, PANDIKKAD, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR (SR.) SRI.S.M.PRASANTH SRI.C.DINESH SMT.JINNU SARA GEORGE RESPONDENT(S)/STATE:

------------------------------------

1. THE SUB COLLECTOR/SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, PERINTHALMANNA, SUB COLLECTOR'S OFFICE, PERINTHALMANNA P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-679 322.

2. MR.T.H.HAMZA, AGED NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, S/O AHAMMED, NEECHIYODAN HOUSE, POOLAMANNA P.O., TUVOOR, PANDIKKAD, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-679 327.

3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031.

R1 & R3 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.SAREENA GEORGE R2 BY ADV. SRI.P.VENUGOPAL THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: msv/

Crl.MC.No. 4436 of 2015 ---------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- ANNEXURE A: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 16.9.2013 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT.

ANNEXURE B: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 7.10.2014 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT.

ANNEXURE C: TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE IST RESPONDENT.

ANNEXURE D: TRUE COPY OF NOTICE DATED 27.6.2015 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES:

NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/

B.KEMAL PASHA, J.

................................................................ CRL. M.C. No. 4436 of 2015 ............................................................... Dated this the 2nd day of September, 2015

O R D E R

Annexure D order passed by the learned Sub Divisional Magistrate, Perinthalmanna is under challenge. Even though a complaint was received and proceedings were initiated under Section 133 Cr.P.C., the learned Sub Divisional Magistrate has passed Annexure D order, which prima facie, seems to be in the form of a final order. 2.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the respondent and the learned Public Prosecutor.

3.

The learned Sub Divisional Magistrate shall treat Annexure D order as an order passed under Section 133(1)

CRL.M.C.No. 4436 of 2015 -: 2 :- Cr.P.C. and shall proceed with the matter under Section 138 Cr.P.C. The parties shall appear before the court below on 28.09.2015. With the said direction, this Crl.M.C. is disposed of.

Sd/- B. KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE.

ul/- // True Copy // PS to Judge