V Biju v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/8TH ASWINA, 1937 Crl.MC.No. 4592 of 2015 ---------------------------------- ST 10000/2014 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, CHANGANACHERRY -------------------- PETITIONER:
------------------- V. BIJU, VIJAYA BHAVAN THURUTHI, CHANGANACHERRY, KOTTAYAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.SURESH SMT.DEEPTHI S.MENON RESPONDENTS:
-----------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
2. ASSISTANT LABOUR OFFICER, CHANGANACHERRY, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686101.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.SAREENA THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30-09-2015, ALONG WITH CRL.MC. 4614/2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
PJ
Crl.MC.No. 4592 of 2015 --------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES ----------------------------------------- ANNEXURE A1: A TRUE COPY OF THE INSPECTION REPORT NO.225222 DATED 19.9.2014 THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
ANNEXURE A2: A RUE COPY OF THE INSPECTION ORDER CUM SHOW CAUSE NOTICE NO.764/2014 DATED 15.10.2014.
ANNEXURE A3: A TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY LETTER ANNEXURE A4: A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT NO;ST.10000/14 ON THE FILE OF THE HON'BLE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATES COURT AT CHANGANACHERRY.
ANNEXURE A5: A TRUE COPY OF THE LICENSE NO.BI.A6-66/14-15, DATED 28.4.2014, ISSUED BY THE KURICHI GRAMA PANCHAYATH, RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES -------------------------------------------- NIL.
/ TRUE COPY / P.S. TO JUDGE PJ
B.KEMAL PASHA, J.
=================== CRL.M.C. Nos.4592 & 4614 of 2015 ==================== Dated this the 30th day of September, 2015
O R D E R
The petitioner in both Crl.M.Cs is the accused in S.T.No.10000 of 2014 and S.T.No.10002 of 2014 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court, Changanacherry.
2. It seems that the prosecution has been initiated against the petitioner through a complaint filed by the Inspector under the Minimum Wages Act, filed under Section 22A of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948.
3. This Court is not presently making any observations with regard to the maintainability or otherwise of the complaint. According to the petitioner, the complaint against him is not maintainable. It is for him to appraise the matter before the court below.
4. Presently, non-bailable warrant has been pending
CRL.M.C. Nos.4592 &4614 of 2015 2 against him in the case. On his surrender before the court below within 15 days from the today, the court below shall consider and dispose of his application seeking bail on the date of its filing itself.
With the said observations, these Crl.M.Cs are closed. Sd/- B. KEMAL PASHA JUDGE DSV/1/10/15 // True Copy // P.A. To Judge