Sayed Shaikoya v. E.P. Attakoya Thangal
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR THURSDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/9TH ASWINA, 1937 Crl.MC.No. 3566 of 2013 () --------------------------- ORDER F.NO.01/05/2013-SDO DATED 20.08.2013 PASSED BY EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE, AMINI ISLAND PETITIONER:
----------- SAYED SHAIKOYA, S/O.THOOPIYAKAL KOYA, PUTHIYA PADIPURA, AMINI ISLAND.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.K.SURESH KUMAR (SR.) SRI.K.P.SUDHEER RESPONDENTS:
--------------
1. E.P. ATTAKOYA THANGAL EAKKARAPALLY HOUSE, KAVARATTI ISLAND MUTHAVALLY OF UJRA MOSQUE AMINI, PIN - 682 555.
2. UNION TERRITORY OF LAKSHADWEEP, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
R2 BY ADV. SRI.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,SC,LAKSHADWEEP ADMN R1 BY ADV. SRI.T.H.ABDUL AZEEZ THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 0110-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.MC.No. 3566 of 2013 () --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- ANNEXURE A1: TRUE COPY OF NOTICE DATED 17/8/2013 ISSUED BY EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE, AMINI ISLAND.
ANNEXURE A2: TRUE COPY OF DOCUMENT NO.61/2010 DATED 25/10/2010 EXECUTED BY SRI.SAITHU SHAIKOYA THANGAL IN FAVOUR OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
ANNEXURE A3: TRUE COPY OF PARTITION DEED NO.166/2008 DATED 31/12/2008 EXECUTED BETWEEN THE FAMILY MEMBERS OF PETITIONER ANNEXURE A4: COPY OF THE SKETCH SHOWING THE LIE OF THE MAKBARA AND ALSO THE UJRA MOSQUE IN THE ADJACENT PLOT.
ANNEXURE A5: TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 15/4/2002 OF ASSISTANT SETTLEMENT OFFICER, AMINI ASSIGNING THE ENTIRE LAND IN SURVEY NO.186/17 IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER'S FATHER. ANNEXURE A6: TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 29/5/2000 OF THE ASSISTANT SETTLEMENT OFFICER WITH REGARD TO THGE LAND IN SY. NO.186/16 ISSUED IN FAVOUR OF THE PREDECESSOR OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE A7: TRUE COPY OF ORDER F. NO.01/05/2013 SDO DATED 20/8/2013 PASSED BY EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE, AMINI ISLAND. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS ---------------------------------------
B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Crl.M.C. No. 3566 of 2013 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 1st day of October, 2015
ORDER
There is no representation for the revision petitioner. The learned advocates for the respondents have submitted that the matter has become infructuous. This Court has dismissed the Crl.RP.No.1985/2013, challenging the same order, holding that the said order does not suffer from any illegality, impropriety or incorrectness warranting interference by this Court. Since the matter has become infructuous, this MC stands dismissed.
Sd/- B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR JUDGE //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE sm/