Rajev v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID MONDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JULY 2015/29TH ASHADHA, 1937 Crl.MC.No. 3580 of 2013 ------------------------- IN C.C NO.906/2013 OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, PERUMBAVOOR CRIME NO. 150/2013 OF PERUMBAVOOR POLICE STATION , ERNAKULAM PETITIONERS/ACCUSED:

--------------------

1. RAJEEV, AGED 36 YEARS S/O NARAYANAN, NEDUMPURAM HOUSE, IRINGOLE P.O, PERUMBAVOOR.

2. BIJU N.R., AGED 35 YEARS, S/O N.G.RAMAKRISHAN, NEDUMPURAM HOUSE, VATAKKATTUPADY, IRINGOLE P.O., PERUMBAVOOR.

3. SAJEEV, AGED 35 YEARS, S/O RAMASWAMI, MARBLE JUNCTION, ALLAPRA P.O.

VENGOLA.

BY ADVS.SRI.N.C.MOHANAN SMT.REKHA C.NAIR RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:

-----------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031.

2. PRASANTH M.T., AGED 32 YEARS, S/O. M.K.THANKAPPAN, MUPRATHADATHIL HOUSE, SASTHAMANGALAM ROAD, KADUVAL, PERUMBAVOOR.

3. PUSHPA THANKAPPAN,, AGED 56 YEARS, M.K.THANKAPPAN, MUPRATHADTHIL HOUSE, SASTHAMANGALAM ROAD, KADUVAL, PERUMBAVOOR.

R2,3 BY ADV. SMT.N.G.SINDHU R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.S.HYMA THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

Crl.MC.No. 3580 of 2013 ----------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:

------------------------ ANNEXURE A1: COPY OF FIR IN CRIME NO.150/2013 OF THE PERUMBVOOR POLICE STION DATED 3.2.2013.

ANNEXURE A2: COPY OF THE CHARGE SHEET CRIME NO.150/2013 OF THE PERUMBAVOOR POLICE STATION DATED 6.5.2013.

ANNEXURE A3: COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THE DEFACTO COMPLAINANT ANNEXURE A4: COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THE CW2, MOTHER OF THE DEFACTO COMPLAINANT.

RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES:

----------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE ab

P.UBAID, J.

--------------------------------------- Crl.M.C No.3580 of 2013 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of July, 2015

O R D E R

A prosecution involving the offence under Sections 448 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code is sought to be quashed on the ground of amicable settlement out of court. The petitioners are the accused in C.C No.906/2013 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Perumbavoor. They seek orders from this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. When the offences are compoundable under the law, the petitioners can very well approach the trial court itself and file composition under Section 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. It is not known why they have approached this Court under Section 482 of Cr.P.C when remedy is available in the trial court itself. Hence this Criminal Miscellaneous Case is disposed of with observation that the petitioners can approach the trial court itself, and file composition.

P.UBAID JUDGE ab