← Library
High Court of KeralaCrl.MC/4714/2015allowed

Ajith Lal v. State Of Kerala

2015-07-27Honourable Mr. Justice P.Ubaid4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID MONDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF JULY 2015/5TH SRAVANA, 1937 Crl.MC.No. 4714 of 2015 --------------------------- CRIME NO. 1176/2015 OF ANCHAL POLICE STATION , KOLLAM PETITIONER/ACCUSED :- --------------------------------- AJITH LAL, PROPRIETOR, SREE RAM BANKERS, ANCHAL, ANCHAL VILLAGE, KOLLAM (DIST).

BY ADVS.SRI.ANIL K.MUHAMED SRI.V.S.MANSOOR RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT & DEFACTO COMPLAINANT :- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

2. ,ASHA SANTHOSH, W/O.SANTHOSH YOHANNAN, AKHIL VILLA, PRASANTH NAGAR, ALAYAMAN MURI, ANCHAL VILLAGE, KOLLAM (DIST) - 691 121.

R1 BY SMT.SREELATHA PARAMESWARAN, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR R2 BY ADV. SRI.S.MOHAMMED AL RAFI THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

Crl.MC.No. 4714 of 2015 --------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES :- ----------------------------------------- ANNEXURE - A : A CERTIFIED COPY OF FIR IN CRIME NO.1176 OF 2015 OF ANCHAL POLICE STATION.

ANNEXURE - B : CERTIFIED COPY OF FIS IN CRIME NO.1176 OF 2015 OF ANCHAL POLICE STATION.

ANNEXURE - C : AFFIDAVIT DATED 22.07.2015 SWORN BY 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES :- NIL -------------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE

P.UBAID, J.

========================= Crl.M.C.No.4714 of 2015 ========================= Dated this the 27th day of July, 2015

ORDER

The petitioner seeks orders quashing the F.I.R and further proceedings in Crime No.1176 of 2015 of Anchal Police Station, Kollam registered under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code on the complaint of one Asha Santhosh. Orders are sought on the ground of amicable settlement of the whole dispute between the accused and the de facto complainant out of court. The de facto complainant is the 2nd respondent in this proceeding brought under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. She has filed affidavit to the effect that she has settled the whole dispute with the accused, and she has no grievance or complaint.

In so many decisions, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that even in cases involving non-compoundable offences, the High Court can quash prosecution; be it at the crime stage or at the trial stage or even at the appellate or revision stage; if the parties have really settled the whole dispute or if continuance of prosecution will not serve any purpose. Here, I find a real case of settlement between

Crl.M.C.No.4714 of 2015 the parties and I also find that continuance of prosecution in such a situation will not serve any purpose other than wasting the precious time of the court, when the case ultimately comes before the court. In the result, this petition is allowed. The F.I.R and further proceedings in Crime No.1176 of 2015 of Anchal Police Station, Kollam will stand quashed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Sd/- P.UBAID JUDGE //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE