Unicharu v. Chekku
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JULY 2015/7TH SRAVANA, 1937 Crl.MC.No. 4747 of 2015 () --------------------------- IN CC 562/2012 of J.M.F.C.,KUNNAMANGALAM CRIME NO. 101/2012 OF MAVOOR POLICE STATION , KOZHIKODE ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED:
------------------------------------------
1. UNICHARU, AGED 68 YEARS S/O.KANNANKUTTY, THOTTATHIL HOUSE, CHEROOPA (PO) KOZHIKODE, PIN-673 661.
2. VELAYUDHAN AGED 63 YEARS, S/O.KANNANKUTTY, THOTTATHIL HOUSE CHEROOPA (PO), KOZHIKODE, PIN-673 661.
3. BABURAJ AGED 44 YEARS, S/O.UNICHARU, THOTTATHIL HOUSE CHEROOPA (PO), KOZHIKODE, PIN-673 661.
4. BAIJU AGED 43 YEARS, S/O.VELAYUDHAN, THOTTATHIL HOUSE CHEROOPA (PO), KOZHIKODE, PIN-673 661.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN SRI.P.V.ANOOP RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANT, VICTIM & STATE :
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. CHEKKU AGED 70 YEARS, S/O.KANNANKUTTY, THAOTTATHIL HOUSE CHEROOPPA (PO), KOZHIKODE, PIN-673 661
2. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682 031. R1 BY ADV. SRI.G.ANEESH R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.DHANESH MATHEW MANJOORAN THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.MC.No. 4747 of 2015 () --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- ANNX.A - CERTIFIED COY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN C.C.NO.562/2012 ON THE FILE OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, KUNNAMANGALAM WHICH AROSE FROM CRIME NO.101/2012 OF MAVOOR POLICE STATION, KOZHIKODE.
ANNX.B - CERTIFIED COPY OF THE CHARGE FRAMED BY THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, KUNNAMANGALAM DATED 13.02.2013 IN CC.NO.562/2012.
ANNX.C - TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT DT.25.07.2015 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS NIL ---------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE VS
ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.
======================= ======================= Dated this the 29th day of July, 2015
ORDER
The petitioners seek orders to quash the F.I.R and further proceedings in Crime No.101/2012 of Mavoor Police Station, registered under Sections 447, 323, 324, 427 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code. Orders are sought on the ground of amicable settlement of the whole dispute between the accused and the de facto complainant out of court. The de facto complainant is the 1st respondent in this proceeding brought under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. He has filed affidavit to the effect that he has settled the whole dispute with the accused and he has no grievance or complaint. 2.
In a catena of decisions, the Apex Court has held that in appropriate cases involving even non-compoundable offences, the High Court can quash prosecution by exercise of the powers under Sec.482 of the Cr.P.C., if the parties have really settled the whole dispute or if continuance of prosecution will not serve any purpose. Here, this Court finds a real case of settlement between the parties and it is also found that continuance of prosecution in such a situation will not serve any purpose other
than wasting the precious time of the court, when the case ultimately comes before the court. On a perusal of the petition and on a close scrutiny of the investigation materials on record and the affidavit of settlement and taking into account the attendant facts and circumstances of this case, this Court is of the considered opinion that the legal principles laid down by the Apex Court in the cases as in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab reported in 2013 (1) SCC (Cri) 160 = (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh and others v. State of Punjab and anr. reported in (2014) 6 SCC 466, more particularly paragraph 29 thereof, could be applied in this case to consider the prayer for quashment. Accordingly, the impugned F.I.R and further proceedings arising out of Crime No.101/2012 of Mavoor Police Station, including all further proceedings arising out of C.C.No.562/2012 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Kunnamangalam, pending against the petitioners herein will stand quashed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
With these observations and directions this Crl.M.C. stands finally disposed of.
ALEXANDER THOMAS JUDGE
vs