Purushan.P.K v. Sub Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/11TH BHADRA, 1937 Crl.MC.No. 4794 of 2015 --------------------------------- CRIME NO. 441/2010 OF HILL PALACE POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM ..........

PETITIONER(S):

----------------------- PURUSHAN P.K., AGED 55, S/O. KUMARAN, PALLATHUPARAMBIL HOUSE, NEAR ST. SEBASTIAN CHURCH, PONJIKKARA, MULAVUKADU, KANAYANUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.DILISH JOHN RESPONDENT(S):

-------------------------

1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, HILL PALACE POLICE STATION, TRIPUNITHURA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682 031.

2. P.K. AJAYAKUMAR, S/O. LATE M.K. NAYAR, RESIDING AT PARUTHIPPILLIL HOUSE, POONITHURA P.O., POONITHURA VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682 014.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.SAREENA GEORGE THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: msv/

Crl.MC.No. 4794 of 2015 --------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES:

ANNEXURE A1: TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DTD.27.12.2006 ENTERED BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND THE 2ND RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE A2: THE TRUE COPY OF FIR NO.441/2010 LODGED BY HILL PALACE POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM.

ANNEXURE A3: TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT GIVEN BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, ERNAKULAM.

RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES:

NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE.

Msv/

B. KEMAL PASHA, J.

````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Crl.M.C. No.4794 of 2015 ````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 2nd day of September, 2015

O R D E R

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Petitioner, who is the de facto complainant in C.C.No.1032/2010, seeks for the execution of the warrant against the accused, who is the 2nd respondent herein. As the accused is absconding, presently, the case is pending as L.P.140/2012. The 1st respondent has filed a report stating that all possible steps have been taken for executing the warrant and a special team has been constituted for effective enquiry. The 1st respondent is directed to take all possible measures to execute the warrant and to take further steps in the matter, in case warrant cannot be executed.

With the said observations, this Crl.M.C. is disposed of. Sd/- (B.KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE) aks/02/09 // True Copy // PA to Judge