← Library
High Court of KeralaCrl.MC/4912/2015dismissed

Raveendran v. State Of Kerala

2015-09-30Honourable Mr. Justice B.Kemal Pasha3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/8TH ASWINA, 1937 Crl.MC.No. 4912 of 2015 ------------------------------------- M.C.NO.125/2010 IN C.C.NO.667/2010 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT -II, CHERTHALA CRIME NO. 342/2010 OF AROOR POLICE STATION , ALAPPUZHA ---------------------- PETITIONER(S)/SURETIES 1 AND 2 :

------------------------------------------------------

1. RAVEENDRAN, S/O.KRISHNAN NAIR, SARALA BHAVANAM, EDATHALA P.O, ALUVA.

2. REJI PRAKASH, S/O.RAMAKRISHNAN NAIR, KEZHUPILLIL HOUSE, EDATHALA P.O, ALUVA.

BY ADV. SRI.G.SANTHOSH KUMAR (P).

RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANT :

----------------------------------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM- 31.

2. DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, REVENUE RECOVERY, ALUVA- 683 564.

3. VILLAGE OFFICER, ALUVA EAST, EDATHALA, ALUVA- 683 564.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.SAREENA GEORGE THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

Msd.

Crl.MC.No. 4912 of 2015 ------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES :

ANNX.I:

TRUE PHOTO COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN C.C NO.667/2010. ANNX.II:

TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 06.02.2012 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 1ST PETITIONER. ANNX.III:

TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 18.03.2013 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND PETITIONER. ANNX.IV:

TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE OBJECTION DATED 22.07.2015 PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONERS.

RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES :

NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE.

Msd.

B.KEMAL PASHA, J.

================ Crl.M.C. No. 4912 of 2015 ======================= Dated this the 30th day of September, 2015

O R D E R

This is a matter challenging proceedings initiated by the court below under Section 446 Cr.P.C against the sureties of an accused. An appeal has been provided under Section 449 Cr.P.C. Without having recourse to Section 449 Cr.P.C., the petitioners have approached this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

This Crl.M.C is dismissed without prejudice to the right of the petitioners to prefer an appeal under Section 449 Cr.P.C.

Sd/- B.KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE stu