Rajeev Maheswari v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS MONDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST 2015/12TH SRAVANA, 1937 Crl.MC.No. 4009 of 2013 () --------------------------- ST. NO.6237/2011 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-II, KOLLAM ------------------------ PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED NO.3 TO 5 :
-----------------------------------------------------------
1. RAJEEV MAHESWARI, DIRECTOR, WALL STREET FINANCE LIMITED, SPICE TOWER, CTS-R10, PHASE-II, ANAND NAGAR, NEW LINK ROAD, JOGESHWARI (WEST), MUMBAI-400102, RESIDING AT 603 B ORION VASANT GALAXY, BANGUR NAGAR, GOREGOAN-WEST, MUMBAI-400 090. (A3).
2. BRIJ GOPAL DAGA, DIRECTOR, WALL STREE FINANCE LTD, SPICE TOWER, CTS-R10, PHASE-II, ANAND NAGAR, NEW LINK ROAD, JOGESHWARI (WEST), MUMBAIR-400 102, RESIDING AT A-1, DEVYANI APARTMENTS MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD, BORIVELI RAST, MUMBAI-400 006 (A4).
3. MADHUKAR R. SARDAR, DIRECTOR, WALL STREET FINANCE LTD, SPICE TOWER, CTS-R10, PHASE-II, ANAND NAGAR, NEW LINK ROAD, JOGESHWARI (WEST), MUMBAI-400 102, RESIDING AT B 10, NAHUR VILLA, MIMALAVIYA MARG, NAHUR ROAD, MUHUND WEST, MUMBAI -400 080. (A5).
BY ADVS.SRI.SASTHAMANGALAM S. AJITHKUMAR SRI.V.S.THOSHIN RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANTS :
----------------------------------------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
2. M/S.LOTUS FOREX PRIVATE LIMITED, AGC COMPLEX, BEACH ROAD, KOLLAM, KERALA, REPRESENTED BY DELVI THANKAN, BRANCH MANAGER, LOTUS FOREX PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLLAM, PIN -691 001. R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.GITHESH.R THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03-08-2015, ALONG WITH CRL.MC.NO. 4010 OF 2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
sts
ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.
================== Crl.M.C Nos. 4009 and 4010 of 2013 ================== Dated this the 3rd day of August, 2015
O R D E R
Sri. Sasthamangalam S. Ajithkumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners in these Crl.M.Cs submits that leave may be granted to the petitioners to withdraw these Crl.M.Cs with liberty to work out the remedies in accordance with law. In view of the submission of the petitioners, both the Crl.M.Cs stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforestated liberty. sd/- sab ALEXANDER THOMAS, JUDGE
- : 2 :-