Jimmy Jose v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS MONDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JULY 2015/29TH ASHADHA, 1937 Crl.MC.No. 3981 of 2014 --------------------------- CC 624/2013 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT - I, KOCHI. .......

PETITIONERS/3RD & 4TH ACCUSED:

-----------------------------------------------------

1. JIMMY JOSE, S/O JOSE THOMAS, AGED 38 YEARS, G-245, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, KOCHI - 682 036.

2. BOBBY JOSE, S/O JOSE THOMAS, AGED 46 YEARS, G-245, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, KOCHI - 682 036.

BY ADV. SRI.SHAFFIE THOMAS RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT/1ST AND 2ND ACCUSED:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

2. K. BABURAJ, AGED 49 YEARS, S/O BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, KAVYA HOUSE, CHELAPALLY ROAD, NAD PO., ALUVA, ERNAKULAM - 686 563.

3. COREVALUE DEVELOPERS & INFRACON PVT. LTD., 1ST FLOOR, NEW BLOCK, CARMEL BUILDING, BANJERI ROAD, KOCHI - 682 018, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, MR. T.P.MURALEEDHARAN

4. MR. T.M.MURALEEDHARAN, DIRECTOR, CORELVALUE DEVELOPERS & INFRACON PVT. LTD., RESIDING AT 31/224 A 'PUSHPANJALI', L.M.PAILY ROAD, VYTTILA, ERNAKULAM - 682 019.

5. THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES, OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES, COIMBATORE, TAMILNADU, STOCK EXCHANGE BUILDINGS, II FLOOR, TRICHY ROAD, SINGANALLUR - 641 005.

R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.DHANESH MATHEW MANJOORAN R5 BY N.NAGARESH, ASG THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20-07-2015 ALONG WITH CRMC. 3982/2014 & CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: mbr/

ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.

================== Crl.M.C.Nos.3981, 3982, 3983, 4973, 4974, 4975, 4976, 4977 4978, 4979, 4980, 4981, 4982, 5753, 5754, 5755, 5757, 5758, 5759, 5760, 5761, 5762, 5771, 5772, 6927, 6928, 6941, 6942, ======================================= Dated this the 20 th day of July, 2015

O R D E R

Sri.Shaffie Thomas, learned counsel for the petitioners (the respective accused 3 and 4) in all these Crl.M.Cs submits that impugned complaints in each of these cases relating to offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act has been withdrawn by the respective complainants (contesting respondent No.2 ) in these cases and that therefore the main matter in issue in these Crl.M.Cs has become infructuous.

In view of the aforestated submission made on behalf of these petitioners, all these Crl.M.Cs are closed as infructuous. Sd/- ALEXANDER THOMAS, JUDGE MJL

- : 2 :-