Malini Raveendran v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA MONDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/4TH KARTHIKA, 1937 Crl.MC.No. 5293 of 2015 () --------------------------- CRL.A 502/2014 of III ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT, ERNAKULAM CC 53/2012 of ADDL.C.J.M.(E&O),ERNAKULAM PETITIONERS/APPELLANTS :
------------------------
1. MALINI RAVEENDRAN, AGED 54 YEARS W/O.RAVEENDRAN, NEELIMA, MARKET ROAD VADUTHALA, KOCHI 23
2. RAVEENDRAN, AGED 59 YEARS S/O.KARTHIKEYA MENON, NEELIMA, MARKET ROAD VADUTHALA, KOCHI 23 BY ADVS.SRI.K.R.VINOD MS.JENCY SUSAN JOSE SRI.V.SRINATH RESPONDENTS:
--------------
1. STATE OF KERALA REP BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM - 682 031.
2. AJITHKUMAR, AGED 43, S/O.VIJAYAN, KALAYATH HOUSE, NEAR VADUTHALA MARKET KOCHI - 23 R2 BY ADV. SRI.P.A.MARTIN ROY R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.MAYA.
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.MC.No. 5293 of 2015 () --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------- ANNEXURE A1:-THE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN CC NO 53/2012 IN THE FILES OF THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT(ECONOMIC OFFENCES)DTD 8/10/2014 ANNEXURE A2:-THE COPY OF CRL.A NO 502/2014 IN THE FILES OF THE 3RD ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT, ERNAKULAM ANNEXURE A3:-THE COPY OF THE STATEMENT EXECUTED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD 17/11/2010 ANNEXURE A4:-THE COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE APPELLATE COURT U/S.391 OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE DTD 15/6/2015 ANNEXURE A5:-THE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE ANNEXURE A4 PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONERS RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :
NIL ------------------------ //True copy// P.A to Judge STU
B.KEMAL PASHA, J.
================ Crl.M.C. No. 5293 of 2015 ======================= Dated this the 26th day of October, 2015
O R D E R
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the 2nd respondent.
2. Annexure-A4 petition has been filed by the petitioners before the Appellate Court for permitting them to adduce additional evidence in the matter. The request at present is precisely for the disposal of Annexure-A4 petition prior to the disposal of the appeal.
In the result, this Crl.M.C is allowed and the court below is directed to dispose of Annexure - A4 in accordance with law, prior to the disposal of the appeal. Sd/- B.KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE stu