Vijayakumar v. Narayana Pilla

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.D.RAJAN WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JULY 2015/31ST ASHADHA, 1937 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 219 of 2005 ( ) -------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN CC 646/2003 of J.M.F.C.-I, THODUPUZHA --------------------------- REVISION PETITIONER(S):

------------------------------------- VIJAYAKUMAR, S/O. SANKARA PILLAI, KARIMANNOOR, THODUPUZHA.

BY ADV. SRI.M.M.MATHEW RESPONDENT(S):

--------------------------

1. NARAYANA PILLA, S/O. KRISHNA PILLA, KURUMATHU KALIPARAMBIL VEEDU, KURUMPALAMATTAM KARA, KARIMANNOOR VILLAGE, THODUPUZHA.

2. RAJEEV, S/O. NARAYANA PILLA, -DO-

3. RADHAKRISHNAN, S/O. KRISHNA PILLA, -DO-

4. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA.

R4 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.SAREENA GEORGE THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 2207-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: STK

P.D. RAJAN, J.

------------------------------- Crl.R.P.No.219 of 2005 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of July, 2015

ORDER

This revision petition is preferred against the judgment of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Thodupuzha for offence punishable under Section 323, 324, 326 r/w 34 IPC. Prosecution examined PW1 to PW9 and admitted Ext.P1 to P8 and MO1 and MO2 in evidence. After analysing the oral and documentary evidence, trial court acquitted the accused and against that the de-facto complainant preferred this appeal. After filing this appeal, several directions were issued by this court to take steps against the respondents. Defects cured and delay was condoned. But no steps were taken against the respondents. Today when the revision petition came up for hearing, no steps are taken. In the circumstance, there is no merit in continuing this revision petition and it is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/- P.D. RAJAN, STK JUDGE //TRUE CO PY// P.A. TO JUDGE