Dr.Radhakrishnan v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW FRIDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/19TH POUSHA, 1936 Crl.MC.No. 4675 of 2013 ----------------------------------- C.C.NO. 777/2012 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, CHAVAKKAD -------------- PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED :
----------------------------------------- DR.RADHAKRISHNAN, AGED 61 YEARS, S/O.NARAYANAN, SANTHIMADOM, NORTH PARAVUR, ERNAKULAMDISTRICT, CHAIRMAN, M/S.SANTHIMADOM BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS, NORTH PARAVUR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.V.A.PRADEEP KUMAR SMT.JENNY THANKAM RESPONDENT(S)/STATE & DEFACTO COMPLAINANT :
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
2. MRS.MARY, AGED 48 YEARS, W/O.JOSHY THAIKKATTIL HOUSE, MULLASSERY P.O., CHAVAKKAD TALUK, PIN - 680 509, THRISSUR DISTRICT. R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.BINDU GOPINATH R2 BY ADV. SRI.SUMODH MADHAVAN NAIR THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Msd.
Crl.MC.No. 4675 of 2013 ------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES :
ANNEXURE-A1:
TRUE COPY OF FIR IN CRIME NO.1167/2011 ON THE FILE OF GURUVAYUR POLICE STATION.
ANNEXURE-A2:
TRUE COPY OF FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO.1167/2011 ON THE FILE OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, CHAVAKKAD.
ANNEXURE-A3:
TRUE COPY OF AGREEMENT EXECUTED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE NOTARY PUBLIC, CHAVAKKAD, DATED 15.03.2013 ANNEXURE-A4:
TRUE COPY OF MEDICAL CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE LOURDS HOSPITAL TO THE PETITIONER, DATED 19.09.2013.
RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES :
NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE.
Msd.
K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Crl.M.C.No.4675 of 2013 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 9th day of January, 2014
O R D E R
The petitioner is the accused in C.C.No.777/2012 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Chavakkad. He is alleged to have committed the offence under Section 420 IPC. The second respondent is the aggrieved person. The proceedings in the trial court is sought to be quashed on the following grounds; no offence is made out in the final report, the matter has been settled between the parties which is evidenced by an agreement and the dispute is of civil nature.
If the materials produced by the prosecution do not disclose commission of the offence, the petitioner may apply for a discharge. If the matter has been settled between the parties, he may approach the learned Magistrate for permission under section 320 Cr.P.C. It is not appropriate
Crl.M.C.No.4675 of 2013 -2to invoke the extraordinary jurisdiction of this court under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
In the result, this Crl.M.C. is dismissed.
Sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE //True copy// P.A. TO JUDGE shg/