← Library
High Court of KeralaOP/1477/1998dismissed as infructuous

Jogy Baby v. The Cochin University

2015-02-023 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN MONDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/13TH MAGHA, 1936 OP.No.1477 of 1998 (A) ------------------------ PETITIONER(S) :

-------------------------

1. JOGY BABU, IV SEMESTER(MACHANICAL) B.TECH DEGREE COURSE STUDENT, COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.

2. R.ANIL KUMAR, IV SEMESTER(MACHANICAL) B.TECH DEGREE COURSE STUDENT, COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.

3. ROSHAN ARAH, IV SEMESTER(MACHANICAL) B.TECH DEGREE COURSE STUDENT, COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.D.SREEKUMAR RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. THE COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, THRIKKAKARA, SOUTH KALAMASSERY, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR.

2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, THE COCHIN UNIVERSITY, THRIKKAKARA, SOUTH KALAMASSERY, ERNAKULAM.

3. THE PRINCIPAL, COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA, ERNAKULAM.

R1 AND R2 BY ADV. SRI.G.MOHAN R3 BY ADV. SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: VS

OP.No.1477 of 1998 (A) -------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :

---------------------------------------- EXT.P1 :

TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PORTION OF THE UNIVERSITY REGULATION OF B.TECH DEGREE NOTIFIED BY THE RESPONDENT UNIVERSITY.

EXT.P2 :

TRUE COPY OF THE DECISION OF THE ACADEMIC COUNSIL DATED 14.5.1997 OF THE RESPONDENT UNIVERSITY.

EXT.P3 :

TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS TO THE RESPONDENT DATED 29.12.1997. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :

NIL ------------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE VS

ANIL.K.NARENDRAN, J --------------------------- O.P.No.1477 of 1998 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of February, 2015

JUDGMENT

The learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Therefore the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- ANIL.K.NARENDRAN JUDGE /TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE vs