Liji Johnson v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/20TH BHADRA, 1937 Crl.MC.No. 5855 of 2015 () --------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN CRMC 1318/2015 of D.C. & SESSIONS COURT,THRISSURN CRIME NO. 583/2015 OF KODAKARA POLICE STATION , TRISSUR PETITIONER/PETITIONER:

------------------------------------ LIGY, AGED 42 YEARS W/O. JOHNSON, CHATHELY HOUSE, ALOOR THRISSUR.

BY ADVS.SRI.LAL K.JOSEPH SRI.A.A.ZIYAD RAHMAN SRI.V.S.SHIRAZ BAVA SRI.JOSEPH KURIAN VALLAMATTAM SRI.K.H.ANSAR RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE KODAKARA POLICE STATION.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.MAYA THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

Crl.MC.No. 5855 of 2015 () --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES ------------------------------------- ANNEXURE A1- TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN CRL.M.C. 1318/2015 PASSED BY THE SESSIONS COURT, THRISSUR DATED 19-6-2015.

ANNEXURE A2- THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 10-8-2015 IN CRL.M.P. 2756/2015 IN CRL.M.C. 1318/2015.

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.S TO JUDGE cl

K. RAMAKRISHNAN, J.

................................................. .................................................. Dated this the 11th day of September, 2015.

O R D E R

This petition is filed by the petitioner seeking modification of the condition imposed by the trial court while granting anticipatory bail under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

2. It is alleged in the petition that the petitioner was granted bail by the Sessions Court, Thrissur as per Annexure-A1 order with conditions interalia directing the second petitioner, who is the petitioner herein, to report before the investigating officer every Monday between 9 a.m and 10 a.m for a period of three months and thereafter as and when required by the investigating officer in writing to do so. The petitioner filed Crl.M.P.No.2756/2015 for lifting that condition but that was dismissed by the court below by Annexure-A2 order. So the petitioner has approached this Court for modification of the condition imposed.

3. Heard both sides.

When this petition came up for hearing today, learned

Public Prosecutor submitted that investigation in this case has already been completed and final report has been filed before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Irinjalakuda and it was taken on file as C.C.No.3769/2015. So there is no necessity to modify the condition arises as the condition will be in force till the investigation is completed. So under the circumstances, the prayer in the petition has become infructous and the petition is dismissed as infructous.

Sd/- K. RAMAKRISHNAN, JUDGE.

/true copy/ P.S to Judge cl