Muraleedharan @ Girija Murlali v. Abdul Harris
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID TUESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2014/15TH ASWINA, 1936 Crl.MC.No. 4778 of 2014 () --------------------------- CRIME NO. 349/2014 OF VELLARIKUNDU POLICE STATION , KASARAGOD PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
---------------------------------------------------------------- MURALEEDHARAN @ GIRIJA MURLALI PROPRIETOR, GIRIJA JEWELLERY, KANHANGAD.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.R.AVINASH (KUNNATH) SRI.ABDUL RAOOF PALLIPATH RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT AND STATE: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. ABDUL HARRIS S/O. ABOOBACKER, RESIDING AT CHIRAMMAL HOUSE KLAYIKODE P.O., PARAPPA, KASARAGOD-671533.
2. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682031.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.C.H.ABDUL RASAC R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. GIKKU JACOB THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07-10-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.MC.No. 4778 of 2014 () --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- ANNEXURE 1- TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO. 349/2014 OF VELLARIKUNDU POLICE ANNEXURE 2- TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS: NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE
P.UBAID, J.
----------------------------- Crl. M.C No. 4778 of 2014 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of October, 2014.
O R D E R
A prosecution under Section 506 (1) is sought to be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C on the ground that the parties have settled the dispute. If relief is sought on the ground of settlement or composition, the parties will have to approach the learned Magistrate, and to have the composition recorded under Section 320 Cr.P.C. Filing an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C in such a case of compoundable offence is really a short cut. This sort of applications cannot be entertained by the High Court.
This Crl. M.C is closed with observation that the parties can approach the trial court itself to have the composition recorded. P.UBAID, JUDGE sab