Annamma Mary v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID MONDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/27TH ASWINA, 1937 Crl.MC.No. 6205 of 2015 --------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN C.M.P NO.5990/2014 AND 5294/2015 IN C.C NO.284/2012 OF THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, KOLLAM CRIME NO. 248/2012 OF KOLLAM WEST POLICE STATION , KOLLAM PETITIONER/DE-FACTO COMPLAINANT:

-------------------------------- ANNAMMA MARY, AGED 43 YEARS, D/O MARY, KIZAKKADATHU, KALLELIBHAGOM.P.O, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT BY ADVS.SRI.K.SIJU SMT.S.SEETHA RESPONDENTS/STATE & ACCUSED:

----------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA THROUGH SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOLLAM WEST POLICE STATION REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

2. MINI. R.K, AGED 46 YEARS, D/O RADHABHAI AMMA, HOUSE NO. 966/36, MINI BHAVAN, MANAYIKULANGARA CHERRY, KOLLAM WEST VILLAGE, KOLLAM R2 BY ADV. SRI.E.M.MURUGAN R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.M.T SHEEBA THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

Crl.MC.No. 6205 of 2015 ----------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:

----------------------- ANNECURE 1: COPY OF THE FIR IN CR. NO. 248/12 OF KOLLAM WEST POLICE STATION ANNECURE 2: COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT SUBMITTED IN CRIME NO. 248/12 OF KOLLAM WEST POLICE STATION ANNECURE 3: COPY OF THE ORDER IN CMP NO. 5990/14 DT. 18/8/14 ON THE FILE OF CJM COURT , KOLLAM ANNECURE 4: COPY OF THE ORDER IN CMP NO. 5294/15 DT. 4/9/15 ON THE FILE FO TH E CJM COURT , KOLLAM RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES:

----------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE ab

P.UBAID, J.

--------------------------------------- Crl.M.C No.6205 of 2015 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of October, 2015

O R D E R

Rejection of an application to receive the unauthenticated photocopies of some documents, by the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Kollam in C.C No.284/2012 is under challenge. I find no reason to interfere in the order passed by the court below. Unauthenticated photocopies cannot be admitted in evidence.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has the certified copies in her possession. If so, the petitioner can very well make a second application before the trial court to receive the certified copies which can be admitted in evidence. Hence, this Crl.M.C is dismissed.

P.UBAID JUDGE ab