Rajesh v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA MONDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/20TH ASWINA, 1937 Crl.MC.No. 6347 of 2015 ------------------------------------- C.C.NO.139/2015 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-II, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -------------------- PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED 1 AND 2 :

------------------------------------------------------

1. RAJESH, AGED 26 YEARS, S/O.RAJENDRAN, MANAKKADIL VEEDU, MADANADA, KULATHOOR P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

2. THEJA, AGED 23 YEARS, S/O.VIKRAMAN, MEDAYIL VEEDU, KULATHOOR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

BY ADV. SRI.A.RAJASIMHAN RESPONDENT(S)/STATE AND THE DEFACTO COMPLAINANT : ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA- 682 031.

2. SUKESH R.S, AGED 20 YEARS, S/O.RAJENDRAN, VALIYAVILAKATHU VEEDU, KULATHOOR P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 001.

R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.MAYA R2 BY ADV. SRI.K.NIRMALAN THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

Msd.

Crl.MC.No. 6347 of 2015 ------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES :

ANNEXURE A1:

CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CC NO.139/2015 PENDING BEFORE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-II, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES :

NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE.

Msd.

B.KEMAL PASHA, J.

================ Crl.M.C. No. 6347 of 2015 ======================= Dated this the 12th day of October, 2015

O R D E R

The petitioners are the accused in C.C No.139/2015 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court-II, Thiruvananthapuram, for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 341, 352 and 506(ii) read with Section 34 IPC.

2. According to the petitioners, the matter has been amicably settled between them and the de facto complainant injured, who is the 2nd respondent herein.

3. On going through the matter, it seems that the injuries are very trivial. No criminal antecedents have been reported against the petitioners. When the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, there is no meaning in proceeding with the matter further. Therefore, all further proceedings in C.C No.139/2015 of the Judicial

Crl.M.C. No. 6347 of 2015 First Class Magistrate's Court-II, Thiruvananthapuram, based on Annexure - A1 final report, can be quashed. In the result, this Crl.M.C is allowed and all further proceedings in C.C No.139/2015 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court-II, Thiruvananthapuram, based on Annexure - A1 final report, are hereby quashed Sd/- B.KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE stu