Ravi v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA MONDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/11TH KARTHIKA, 1937 Crl.MC.No. 6888 of 2015 () --------------------------- CRIME NO. 516/2015 OF SHORNUR POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD DISTRICT ------------------- PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 :

-------------------------------------------- RAVI, AGED 43 YEARS S/O.SREEDHARAN, KARAKKAD, KAVALAPPARA P.O.

OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.NIREESH MATHEW RESPONDENTS/STATE & DEFACTO COMPLAINANT :

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031.

2. ANILKUMAR, AGED 30 YEARS S/O.AYYAPPAN, KALATHIL KUNNATH, CHUDAVALATHUR SHORNUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-676 001.

R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. SAREENA GEORGE R2 BY ADV. SRI.VIVEK VENUGOPAL THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/-

Crl.MC.No. 6888 of 2015 () ------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES :

--------------------------------------------- ANNEXURE-A:

CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIRST INFORMATION REPORT AND F.I. STATEMENT IN CRIME NO.516/2015 OF SHORNUR POLICE STATION.

ANNEXURE-B:

THE ORIGINAL OF THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN TO BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 BEFORE HIS ADVOCATE AT PALAKKAD DTD.16.10.2015.

RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES : NIL ---------------------------------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Mn

B.KEMAL PASHA, J.

================ Crl.M.C. No. 6888 of 2015 ======================= Dated this the 2nd day of November, 2015

O R D E R

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.516/2015 of the Shornur Police Station, Palakkad District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323 and 506(i) read with Section 34 IPC and Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

2. Initially, there were two accused. Presently, the 2nd accused has been deleted from the array of the accused and therefore, the petitioner is the sole accused in the crime.

3. The matter has been amicably settled between the parties. The de facto complainant is the 2nd respondent herein. The de facto complainant has filed Annexure-B affidavit affirming that the matter has been amicably settled between him and the petitioner and he has no complaints or

Crl.M.C. No. 6888 of 2015 grievance against the petitioner.

4. When the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, no purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further and therefore, all further proceedings in Crime No.516/2015 of the Shornur Police Station, Palakkad District based on Annexure-A FIR can be quashed.

In the result, this Crl.M.C is allowed and all further proceedings in Crime No.516/2015 of the Shornur Police Station, Palakkad District based on Annexure-A FIR as against the petitioner, are hereby quashed.

Sd/- B.KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE stu