Rahul Prasad K v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA MONDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/11TH KARTHIKA, 1937 Crl.MC.No. 6897 of 2015 () --------------------------- CC. NO. 423/2015 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-III, THRISSUR. ......

PETITIONER/ACCUSED:

------------------------------------ RAHUL PRASAD K., AGED 24 YEARS, S/O. KANAKARAJ, PARAYIL VELIKKALAM, VENGODI. P.O., PALAKKAD-678 622.

BY ADV. SRI.T.K.SANDEEP.

RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT & STATE:

--------------------------------------------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-31.

2. T.U. SAJEEVAN, S/O.UNNICHEKKAN, AGED 49 YEARS, THACHAPILLY VEEDU, THALIYAKKONAM, MADAYIKKONAM. P.O, THRISSUR, PIN-680 712.

R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.P. MAYA.

R2 BY SRI.GOKUL DAS V.V.H.

THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

rs.

Crl.MC.No. 6897 of 2015 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:- ANNEXURE-I A TRUE COPY OF THE F.I.R. ALONG WITH FIS DATED 28.01.2015 IN CRIME NO.133/2015 OF PEECHI POLICE.

ANNEXURE-II A TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT/CHARGE SHEET IN CRIME NO.133/2015 DATED 30.01.2015 OF PEECHI POLICE. ANNEXURE-III A TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT DATED 17.10.2015 FILED BY 2ND RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:- NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE rs.

B.KEMAL PASHA, J.

================ Crl.M.C. No. 6897 of 2015 ======================= Dated this the 2nd day of November, 2015

O R D E R

The petitioner is the accused in C.C.No.423/2015 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court-III, Thrissur, which has arisen from Crime No.133/2015 of the Peechi Police Station, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 324 and 294(b) IPC.

2. The parties have settled the matter amicably. The 2nd respondent herein is the de facto complainant. The de facto complainant has filed Annexure -III affidavit affirming that the matter has been amicably settled and he has no complaints against the petitioner.

3. No criminal antecedents have been reported against the petitioner. It seems that the injuries sustained by the de facto complainant are trivial. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and the settlement arrived at

Crl.M.C. No. 6897 of 2015 between the parties, this Court is satisfied that no purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter. Matters being so, all further proceedings in C.C.No.423/2015 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court-III, Thrissur, based on Annexure -II final report in Crime No.133/2015 of the Peechi Police Station, can be quashed.

In the result, this Crl.M.C is allowed and all further proceedings in C.C.No.423/2015 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court-III, Thrissur, based on Annexure -II final report in Crime No.133/2015 of the Peechi Police Station, are hereby quashed.

Sd/- B.KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE stu